[P2PSIP] Resuming work on -concepts: confirmation call

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Fri, 02 August 2013 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235B021E82D5 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4Df1px0J8xN for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED68421E80CA for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63441894F61 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:47:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [130.129.85.5] (dhcp-5505.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.85.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cjbc@smtp02.uc3m.es) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01A978748F6 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:47:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1375440443.4364.35.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: p2psip@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:47:23 +0200
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.0.0.1014-20052.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--13.542-7.0-31-1
X-imss-scan-details: No--13.542-7.0-31-1
Subject: [P2PSIP] Resuming work on -concepts: confirmation call
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:47:35 -0000

Hi,

During the meeting session at IETF87, there was a strong consensus on
resuming and finishing the work on draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts. As per
usual IETF procedures, this has to be confirmed on the ML.

Please, if you have an opinion on whether the WG should spend some of
its CPU cycles on draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts to publish it as
informational RFC or not, please share it on the ML. This short
confirmation call finishes on August, 9th.

Thanks,

Chairs