[p2p-sip] Comments to draft-baset-sipping-p2pcommon-00

[hsinnrei at adobe.com (Henry Sinnreich)]

I also like the approach and as mentioned, Bamboo/openDHT should be
included as well. 

Because the proximity neighbor selection of Bamboo can be based on
latency, it is the most preferable IMHO.

Henry

-----Original Message-----
From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Jani Hautakorpi
(JO/LMF)
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:10 AM
To: salman at cs.columbia.edu; hgs at cs.columbia.edu;
eunsoo at research.panasonic.com
Cc: p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [p2p-sip] Comments to draft-baset-sipping-p2pcommon-00

Hi all,

I read your draft draft-baset-sipping-p2pcommon-00 and I didn't quite
get what is the long-term goal of this draft? At the moment it really
doesn't contain a lot of information that wouldn't already be documented
in draft-singh-p2p-sip-00.

However, I liked the title of the draft "A protocol for Implementing
Various DHT Algorithms", because I personally believe that a common
protocol for different DHT algorithm would be useful (and feasible).
Please check my inline comments from:

http://users.piuha.net/jantzgu/temp/draft-baset-sipping-p2pcommon-00-com
mented.html


-- 
Regards,
Jani Hautakorpi
_______________________________________________
p2p-sip mailing list
p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip