Re: [P2PSIP] Draft of meeting minutes uploaded

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 06 August 2012 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1085911E80A5 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.786
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.786 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zC8p57zrJke for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1735511E809A for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (89.141.95.213.dyn.user.ono.com [89.141.95.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cjbc@smtp01.uc3m.es) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE924C3F74C; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:29:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1344292189.5752.81.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:29:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <502041D5.6050906@acm.org>
References: <1343811848.4991.6.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <501EAE07.8070703@acm.org> <1344287948.5752.34.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <502041D5.6050906@acm.org>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2kYpd6G3Fpg94KNJr1+1"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-6.8.0.1017-19082.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.216-7.0-31-1
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.216-7.0-31-1
Cc: P2PSIP WG <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Draft of meeting minutes uploaded
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:29:52 -0000

Hi Marc,

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:14 -0700, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 02:19 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> > Dear Marc,
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for your revision of the minutes. Please see some comments 
> > inline below.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 10:31 -0700, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2012 02:04 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> A draft of the minutes is available:
> >>> 
> >>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-p2psip
> >>> 
> >>> Many thanks Miguel Angel for providing the minutes.
> >>> 
> >>> Please provide your feedback by the end of next week.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 1. The minutes about the beginning of the WG session are missing, i.e.
> >> the part about the timeline of WGLCs for the following drafts:
> >> 
> >> - draft-ietf-p2psip-drr - draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr -
> >> draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning - draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery -
> >> draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts - draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics
> > 
> > Well, this was supposed to be covered by "The chairs go through the WG 
> > status.", as Brian basically went through the slides. Would it be enough if
> > we modify it to say "The chairs go through the WG status slides."?
> > 
> 
> I was not sure that I got the order of the WGLCs right during the meeting,
> especially with -diagnostics moved up, but now that I see that -drr and -rpr
> are WGLCed, as promised, I think the text is fine.

The plan (not 100% confirmed) after some discussion with our AD is to
issue WGLC of -diagnostics after -drr and -rpr, and then self-tuning,
and service-discovery.

> 
> Thanks again for resolving these quickly.

Thanks for the comments.

Carlos

> 

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano  http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67