IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04: (with COMMENT)

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Sun, 18 September 2016 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B5812B01C; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIAEiCgg7l6y; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C8EF12B004; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CWJ58775; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 06:46:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.33) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 07:46:55 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.3]) by SZXEMA415-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:46:49 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSDr5vfgINuu9dmESDV8IMRo9XjaB+0lRQ
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 06:46:49 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B91762752@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <147388141456.19774.5045376244596382956.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147388141456.19774.5045376244596382956.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.203.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.57DE3860.0095, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.3, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: f6196d61beea9ed0d3bba54775e5b94a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/Iqr1xzZYsLpmhxYSWM8FlganKoU>
Cc: "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "agmalis@gmail.com" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 06:47:02 -0000

Hi Spencer,

To be more consistent, we will use the same texts "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) is being extended to the edge of operator networks" in the Abstract.

Thanks,
Yuanlong

-----Original Message-----
From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 3:30 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon@ietf.org; Andrew G. Malis; pals-chairs@ietf.org; agmalis@gmail.com; pals@ietf.org
Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I was surprised by this text in the Abstract,

   MPLS is being deployed deeper into operator networks, often to or
   past the access network node. 
   
because I don't think what this is saying, matches text like this in the Introduction,

   Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) is being extended to the edge
   of operator networks, as is described in the the Multi-Segment
   Pseudowires with Passive Optical Network (PON) access use case
   [RFC6456]. 

Is it "to the edge", or "past the access network node"? But if there's no reason to use a different description, you might consider using the same description in both places.

Of course, you folks are the experts on how MPLS is deployed ... and maybe I'm just confused by which direction you mean when you say "deeper"!

I am also interested in resolution of Stephen's Discuss.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email