[Pals] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8077 (5243)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 25 January 2018 06:53 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E28C12E04A for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:53:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mC4LcKn5kuWY for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07F9F12DA42 for <pals@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9DB56B80F83; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:53:27 -0800 (PST)
To: lmartini@monoski.com, giheron@cisco.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, agmalis@gmail.com, stewart.bryant@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jbhardwa@ciena.com, pals@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180125065327.9DB56B80F83@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:53:27 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/OfhcHc0EqmZi-zonl2sMJ2VCtTU>
Subject: [Pals] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8077 (5243)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:53:44 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8077, "Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5243 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: JAYANT BHARDWAJ <jbhardwa@ciena.com> Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- - Group ID An arbitrary 32-bit value that represents a group of PWs that is used to create groups in the PW space. The Group ID is intended to be used as a port index or a virtual tunnel index. To simplify configuration, a particular PW Group ID at ingress could be part of a Group ID assigned to the virtual tunnel for transport to the egress router. The Group ID is very useful for sending wildcard label withdrawals or PW wildcard status Notification messages to remote PEs upon physical port failure. Corrected Text -------------- - Group ID An arbitrary 32-bit value that represents a group of PWs that is used to create groups in the PW space. The Group ID is intended to be used as a port index or a virtual tunnel index. To simplify configuration, a particular PW Group ID at ingress could be part of a Group ID assigned to the virtual tunnel for transport to the egress router. The Group ID is very useful for sending wildcard label withdrawals or PW wildcard status Notification messages to remote PEs upon physical port failure or transport tunnel failure. Notes ----- The PW group can be created on basis of the transport tunnel index. So Group Id can be used to send PW wildcard status notification to remote PEs on physical port failure or Transport tunnel failure. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8077 (draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Publication Date : February 2017 Author(s) : L. Martini, Ed., G. Heron, Ed. Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pals] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8077 (5243) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Pals] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8077 (5… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Pals] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8077 (5… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [Pals] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8077 (5… Eric Gray