Re: [Pals] IPR on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Tue, 28 June 2016 07:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E7812DAFD for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YoMwKeSEvohI for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854C212DAFB for <pals@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CMU31531; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:26:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:26:51 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.196]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:26:46 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] IPR on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection
Thread-Index: AQHRwY+SOwRlA6y9LkOJlCARDRUHy5/4kSCAgAYHqsA=
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:26:45 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B916DA7E9@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <010a6365-a7ed-e9c9-932a-dc253cd4fb56@gmail.com> <047F1590-C29B-45DF-ADB8-8C2FD161D565@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <047F1590-C29B-45DF-ADB8-8C2FD161D565@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.203.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.577226C2.0005, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.196, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 712389a049d0c7c9f418e48b78109368
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/mFbYqEfRee9Z_5ys6r-nms2mw-g>
Cc: "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:27:02 -0000

Hi all,

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.

Thanks,
Yuanlong

On 6/8/16, 10:10 AM, "Pals on behalf of Stewart Bryant" <pals-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:

>I have just picked up draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection, and am 
>trying to figure out where we are with IPR disclosures on this.
>
>This was at one time a very active work area and so I was surprised to 
>only see one disclosure.
>
>I have filed a third party disclosure on a patent that may be relevant.
>
>Sorry if this is the second time of asking, but please can each author 
>respond to this email indicating whether or not they are aware of any 
>relevant IPR.
>
>If any member of the working group is aware of any IPR, please can they 
>also indicate this to the working group by responding to this email.
>
>Thanks
>
>Stewart
>
>