Re: [Pals] IPR poll for draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping

"Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com> Mon, 09 May 2016 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <paragj@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962A112D0A0; Mon, 9 May 2016 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYTc1aaOsZ9k; Mon, 9 May 2016 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E30D12B03F; Mon, 9 May 2016 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8086; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1462807825; x=1464017425; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=njJjNw8K+azlie4ZP0H+UHEkebrRD99AFj34iYGE36w=; b=gw2vz9ZWCel75F2hUAHR1iMb4dq87X8HGNK2fStAIg9ulDZ4sRcau5aX 9hs9PYNwKGHgrqz88NSCyeuzYk2CKMIgHu8jL5R0IEFlRzayA1OK9RLYM +yvOnb+yt56/B4hzxfdw5NNZHNfU4TAfSOAMT5ko9h8s2lXN1b8boaIJw 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B3AgCdrDBX/5ldJa1dgmxMVX0GrR2GboR0AQ2BdiKFbgKBMTgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEEZg4VAgEIEQMBAigHIREUCQgCBAESiBUDEw67Gw2EKQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIYghEyCQ4FOEQE8FoUjBY4WiVsxAYV8hiaBeYFphE+IX4dYh2IBHgEBQoNrbodRNgF+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,601,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106102050"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2016 15:30:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u49FUORh003477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 May 2016 15:30:24 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 9 May 2016 11:30:23 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 9 May 2016 11:30:23 -0400
From: "Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>, "draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll for draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping
Thread-Index: AQHRqgHDVztiQGpUuUKlLWIyJQ3qDp+wu2AA
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 15:30:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D356216E.3FE33%paragj@cisco.com>
References: <CAA=duU0Jef1km52YkUakY2P5SKWBBMiNKe835fv_ek9q-FUN6A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0Jef1km52YkUakY2P5SKWBBMiNKe835fv_ek9q-FUN6A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D356216E3FE33paragjciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/mb5HXqichFbXiNLqDJ8APMc6baA>
Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR poll for draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 15:30:27 -0000

Hi Andy

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Regards,
Parag
--
Parag Jain (paragj@cisco.com<mailto:paragj@cisco.com>)
CSG IOS-XR Routing
. : | : . : | : .
CISCO
2000 Innovation Drive, Kanata, ON, Canada K2K 3J9

From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 10:47 AM
To: "pals@ietf.org<mailto:pals@ietf.org>" <pals@ietf.org<mailto:pals@ietf.org>>, "draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org<mailto:draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org>" <draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org<mailto:draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR poll for draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: Parag Jain <paragj@cisco.com<mailto:paragj@cisco.com>>, <sboutros@vmware.com<mailto:sboutros@vmware.com>>, <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>>
Resent-Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 10:47 AM

Working Group,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-01 has been
requested for PALS working group adoption.

We will conduct an IPR poll before the adoption poll is started.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-jain-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

There are no IPR disclosures currently filed against this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG email list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

This call will remain open until we've heard back from all of the authors and contributors.

Thanks,
Andy