IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E711ACD93 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:21:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqD5FI2IZKo3 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44551ACD91 for <pals@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BPX07065; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:21:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:21:39 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.156]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:21:36 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org" <draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft
Thread-Index: AQHQT23dMJnJ1JYkG0+nAoAiFFvg5Z0DNzeAgAnuaFA=
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:21:36 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E97@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <548986EC.6050806@cisco.com> <54EB2CF2.1010903@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B915900@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B915900@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.46.89.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/zOw5H70EQhJkCh_XVpyoLETYNCQ>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:21:46 -0000

Support.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Mirsky
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 9:39 AM
To: stbryant@cisco.com; draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org; pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft

yes/support

The document addresses realistic in MPLS-TP network case when ICCP cannot be used to coordinate state within PE redundancy group. Using G-ACh is logical approach then.

	Regards,
		Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:37 AM
To: draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org; pals@ietf.org
Subject: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft


Working Group,

This email starts a poll to see whether there is consensus to adopt draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as a WG draft of the PALS WG.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the PALS working group mailing list (pals@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

This poll will conclude on 9th March 2015

- Stewart


_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email