Re: [Pana] Issue 143: CTP and PANA editorial clarification

Hi Alper,

There are a couple of people (including myself) who think this
mobility section can be improved to be flexibile enough to support
future CTP protocol changes and any other mobility optimization
scheme.  I will submit suggested text soon.

Yoshihiro Ohba

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 01:49:38PM -0800, Alper Yegin wrote:
> http://danforsberg.info:8080/pana-issues/issue143
> 
> The PaC DOES have an active role in PANA mobility optimization. It
> conveys its desire to use CTP by including its session ID in the
> PANA-Start-Answer. This is not CTAR, but this is an explicit "message".
> 
> This is a CTP (draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-11.txt) design issue. I recommend
> this be fixed in seamoby-ctp, or another simple CTP can be designed. I
> don't think we shall morph PANA solution to fit the seamoby-ctp design
> (which I think has some room for improvement -- as PANA example shows). 
> 
> The PANA spec states seamoby-ctp MAY be useful, it does not mandate its
> use. 
> 
> Regarding CTP module vs. PANA module, I think this is an implementation
> issue. One module needs to talk to the other, and there needs to be
> interface between the two.
> 
> So, I recommend we reject this issue.
> 
> Alper
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana

_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana