RE: [Pana] Mobility Handling in PANA

Giaretta Gerardo <Gerardo.Giaretta@TILAB.COM> Wed, 14 July 2004 08:09 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA00885 for <pana-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 04:09:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bkebt-00069s-UB; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:55:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BkeZZ-0004kq-B6 for pana@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:53:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA29889 for <pana@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BkeZW-0004TD-M3 for pana@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:52:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BkeYZ-00049r-00 for pana@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:52:00 -0400
Received: from dns2.tilab.com ([163.162.42.5]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BkeXw-0003Wc-00 for pana@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:51:21 -0400
Received: from iowa2k01b.cselt.it ([163.162.242.202]) by dns2.cselt.it (PMDF V6.1 #38895) with ESMTP id <0I0U00B2305C4C@dns2.cselt.it> for pana@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:44:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from EXC2K01A.cselt.it ([163.162.4.34]) by iowa2k01b.cselt.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:48:49 +0200
Received: from EXC2K01B.cselt.it ([163.162.4.97]) by EXC2K01A.cselt.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:50:50 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:50:50 +0200
From: Giaretta Gerardo <Gerardo.Giaretta@TILAB.COM>
Subject: RE: [Pana] Mobility Handling in PANA
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@samsung.com>
Message-id: <625BE97BF4795E43970345790166B9BCD4DF41@EXC2K01B.cselt.it>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
Thread-Topic: [Pana] Mobility Handling in PANA
thread-index: AcRpIHFHyLr7KW3bRgKt8dRCQ+fI5AAUq9Rg
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2004 07:50:50.0598 (UTC) FILETIME=[482A6860:01C46977]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Julien Bournelle <Julien.Bournelle@int-evry.fr>, yohba@tari.toshiba.com, pana@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Alper,

> 
> > Thus we propose this:
> > 
> > 
> >      PaC           nPAA              pPAA
> >      ----------------------------------------
> >            PDI
> >       -------------->
> >            PSR
> >      <---------------
> >           PSA [old Session-ID, Nonce, CTAR]
> >       --------------->
> > 
> >                            CT-Request
> >                         -------------->
> >                                CTD
> >                         <--------------
> > 
> >       PBR[new Session-ID, Key-Id, Nonce, PPAC, MAC]
> >      <-------------
> >       PBA[new Session-ID, Key-Id, PPAC, MAC]
> >       ------------->
> 
> This is the flow I had in my mind, but I don't see the need 
> to have an explicit CTAR AVP in the PSA.
> 
> Looking at the draft, CTAR carries:
> - PaC's address. Why do we need this? The Pac is identified 
> with its session id.
> - PAA's address. I don't think we need this either. Session 
> id reveals the ID of the pPAA. It's just a matter of mapping 
> that to an IP address (use DNS).
> - Authorization token. MAC AVP already does the job.
>

CTAR (and thus a CTAR AVP in our draft) is always required by CTP as
specified in draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-10.txt. It is not possible to use
CTP without sending a CTAR message both in predictive and reactive mode.
This is because in CTP the transfer is authorized trough the
authorization token that is shared between pAR and MN. However, I
completely agree with you that the information carried by CTAR can be
obtained by other means as you stated above. 

I think here the issue is whether we want to apply the Seamoby CTP or to
define a context transfer mechanism only for PANA (which exploits PANA
features).

--Gerardo



> Alper
> 
> 
> 
> 


Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

====================================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to
MailAdmin@tilab.com. Thank you
====================================================================

_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana