[PANRG] PANRG sessions between now and IETF 112
Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 19 August 2021 14:46 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CAF3A1D30
for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id t8b59oO1s9-y for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C37443A1D2B
for <panrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id i1so4161556vsk.8
for <panrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=9FcXHvd0rx3QXeQoQMe82TJuykdDGqOBCw88w637nx0=;
b=oO1S0b7pJog2BS1uTRqWDRyV1lUDCngBSSvlDPt5AkXuWS8U8lAHzxq0MPe460Pkmv
RRTKsorPg1oqg0S+qHTi9ig5205jz5AbOJubNbyYUMh0drCZR1BkTyJxrf0diMEy3C3f
KaTYDNn6Nr6orNiwYE9wNwLIdrctxsW0eDB9urbMmjhjMsYqkykrVoLHLXGSxJHLPAhw
j8HEV+wRU+Lok3m43eGZjsSwY4AK9EQyrnavfxHNL6SCyxw+TY5tl8MVdivwlpk0Pv/Y
lEaKmEdl67JdH7r/WLmIH9VmfuJPf7LhF1C7LzPfR6LMjEUvu9lA/gP/H2+lYzaSvCwR
K+Zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=9FcXHvd0rx3QXeQoQMe82TJuykdDGqOBCw88w637nx0=;
b=OegGSMZ5qtfGJG1ylGTOHydP5MiQCwMYRn0bOg962fFh2gSooxsdk+V9JrGJD9zrQ+
cYsT/eSzB3I7RNM1hdeRxsCeQEqO+Og7ugJJmxMHLEW5fesnJnFKzdAz14Rbt1nh6OkW
C3eYwSphi8zkEJBhA24knU+crEuu96RxSSNgeOHY0CHMNVCY8KL3ZjqbNPUk8xDyZtTm
PyJh23j8qt2RHM4QA8w+MbdHAIjEDe+AEHdYyuY859t4dHYR7En485KUfr5UDPpjcpJl
xbqmTnAjHexbC1Q1ClFMP74NTzCT4mnDvItW1srS+5y5l9gbgAR72wa8tmzbJ7S+jatZ
fu4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XhnjxctmzGeH8wdhX7VPKSgUb4CJG+J8oSUywrHl1olxAveow
WKWtCGwHUSck1KqdI6cvwMDzw6uZmUfbDikBhbagdyYuXV8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyi2kavgDAZhl39obca0TiimuPU73ugomsZ+IBdmBe6rN/IIYPtGCbvgvrrDKF8PbXhCFSVBS1aoN9CR8keReo=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d09:: with SMTP id y9mr12705764vsc.26.1629384372581;
Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 09:45:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fW64WMZsu+4sekygXAK8xk9R4dSN26zjEoZqmwUUgF_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: panrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000baf7eb05c9ea9c03"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/OH9ZwH2Cq62C9-pP-VumdfoaRCk>
Subject: [PANRG] PANRG sessions between now and IETF 112
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list"
<panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>,
<mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>,
<mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:46:21 -0000
Dear PANRG, I'm seeing session requests from other groups popping up for IETF 112, and had a question that I hope we think about. We said during PANRG at IETF 111 that we needed more than an hour to allow for discussion of the topics on our agenda, so we could ask the chairs to request a two-hour slot, but it seemed to me that we may have new topics in PANRG after the IETF 111 session, (at least some aspects of multipath, proposals like Tommy Pauly's presentation on "Path Aware Routing Over MASQUE proxies" that are more modern than the proposals we included in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9049/, and anything that comes out of the ALTO community after we invited them to bring work to PANRG at IETF 111). Would it make sense to have a PANRG interim meeting, either before or after IETF 111? Obviously the PANRG co-chairs will Do The Right Thing, but it might be helpful if they knew what the RG was thinking. Best, Spencer
- [PANRG] PANRG sessions between now and IETF 112 Spencer Dawkins at IETF