IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PANRG] I-D Action: draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-10.txt

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340863A1356 for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmVxey_0ctMV for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA313A1354 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id k18so17996983qke.4 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oVD7Rb8GL54z8+7dMOmN0dI5Ewrt8or4nbzXQXW6XaM=; b=RZj7lgLknSULPr0tQRgueu6lveQwK7YMxQoT7p0jXdXCxt1KfhwKK3wwNrc4KmteUT D2SrQDxpp70fkOpEAsnIcfSXKgZyfwTmzXMgmJW+jSNvAZ6BDt/dBN61Ggs6fYIv4RuV wNSaH1fj3B2Lh3I5pGH10sV3TX8rwoh7O32N0NCYwjwSrDRtqc0/8x1dizPPyjd2wOoa 1DTq6VWYfjis0L6B1TYW7leCMeq3ZkOkxzJQePyG4SOF6IlhxTOV3mZu1bEcLR1Bcbho bkOpqhA2bFgvdl08pvQ8lpR2lLhaDbPTeJlVWnfsBXEzmxyBCtT7SCw+DpM3AwqYFg44 5lVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oVD7Rb8GL54z8+7dMOmN0dI5Ewrt8or4nbzXQXW6XaM=; b=QpjZDxkBVlotz3ZZWYLdHI2M9hLfECd7x3Kq8coZWre3vCQD4H9/hJ05vNaNmgHc0+ DAhA0JMsNJ5Z3VpVtYU9cRlmABh+1yptgls62uDJDWuKBelcelREd1TCUDV9asEVvmvx TcNcZmlCNH0Zyl2GRaTlkdrVJ/kFSmyZKc4ibmhnFYaZHTD+ows8vGW3nHkb6rg5wiE7 YiMXRIREY454xe+WBYhJs9thmicwx20fV8T+cmvIq6BaemVhXi+mHKTcwUINU0+KVDXe bLMlwTzCkniSMKi8EFAGrDZoQ4hUnQs7cqaX31hEMSy57/pkcdAVps23/Mo2fhmCfgQy COXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Z3joraLrYxhRMYidDy8wXK143OTsRB3PEz7C8mI4/6x3UfK5G oUrq2ROkO6djFY5Wsr19y0i5gEPqstiUKnex7bk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKjpGKrCftTliY77Swj1h6+h1nd026Nl8icLNgXl5cP4qAMCbB1rfVcmrwD7yMVeD+ceQgrTkKtxidodNTH5M=
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:dcc6:: with SMTP id q189mr26139335qkf.332.1595301515051; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159417679704.25830.1254352128780008991@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-e7k+x0rqYg_y8Nv4ht0Sh0qDvt65mAqeoncCT+WGwnUQ@mail.gmail.com> <24122_1594823879_5F0F14C7_24122_77_8_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330314F99C0@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKKJt-fPOWCBWDoZtYLiaeR3ArrR+-pJe_Sad-m4ECWPADbjzA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-fPOWCBWDoZtYLiaeR3ArrR+-pJe_Sad-m4ECWPADbjzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 13:18:24 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQhLF1Ntpk+tuXNbuWW9f0A3aOZgYWDP9WLDqYovHGhAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, panrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/ThVlujP6qF8LFklk9TvnZtHXnXw>
Subject: Re: [PANRG] I-D Action: draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-10.txt
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list" <panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 03:18:37 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:33 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF
<spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seemed right to me that I would point to the definition in - I-D.irtf-panrg-questions in what-not-to-do, rather than repeat the working definition in what-not-to-do.
>
> It seemed right to me that the reference to  I-D.irtf-panrg-questions would be normative, so that's what I did.
>
> ANOTHER way of doing this, is repeating the definition from  I-D.irtf-panrg-questions in what-not-to-do, with an informative reference to  I-D.irtf-panrg-questions.
>
> Does anyone object to me copying the definition over?

I believe we shall decide the fate of  I-D.irtf-panrg-questions first
(see another thread, where Med expressed some objections to publishing
that draft as an RFC).
I'd suggest deferring any actions on what-not-to-do for now -
hopefully we can sort the dependencies out as soon as possible.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email