Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS)
Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C1B1A06CD; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWXodGBDk_fk; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4501D1A0698; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id mc6so8999987lab.20 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BcQKVpaSNMly53Y/nlWTGyk+lOxBXlvx7xo/YcsdWLM=; b=KKW6xMvIQfHKU1ZjnN6psLPyzurXxULFWjFbx5I1tzO8JFxjH6l65fDeYrZ9i9ltNT xup1ft+Zy4rvIWz0F+mzDpxogb2LYPUEW9M1N8gq5ncvy3X6GZmAKcAAdwcxEhDpDjV9 TXlGzHqQCLwOW5hRDFRjNO76+SG2v+lCVmgd+tubWmMtZD/5pPQk8AaONi0aVw/eGt5K gA29l9xdoEukOf9vjXOoCWrQHZbCSqft17ePqBq2p0vE4NoaPsXTMc7eu/41st2mNAsO YTYvfF4kiMr5jdFIothJVVNDw4FnqmuiMKMjvZ0zN55bOFpYxZNWW05vA1hAX5K+9lbN rs3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.169.35 with SMTP id ab3mr504417lbc.41.1408650662647; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.64.170 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F64D64.8050002@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20140820203127.25270.64032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53F50D2D.2010203@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAHbuEH4RsF4kkUd8qO+bsCbzs6xRB=TL6hg2GyGWKf8OvJjViw@mail.gmail.com> <CABEV9RP7Dzk46JsUQ15z8kMvTGNOUCUjWmzQkVGyQbnjpvkLRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH4+=tUQNRmURd3r047UYhSe=LPyJVZUEq4X+uYDMOaWrw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7Ms5QuMwgFXy9OuXTcgvGR-9AyDJMnX-T7qEHema84-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABEV9RPHCq14oF9CYdVmn0NHaqfQf1mton0WE9-Hn1zMCHyfqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH5DSi86tndZLXRqJzkS4pGTp3vSpZKU2tnja2Y1nN0ScQ@mail.gmail.com> <53F64D64.8050002@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:51:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6X=THkNCephbYA6Yp2k5T6_Wkby1b5A-_O=9tnzUe42w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2696a5c1d270501290a4b"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/YLTFYICX2VLdTf_oMW48PtJyZRE
Cc: "paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:51:06 -0000
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 21/08/14 20:44, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > > OK, this isn't my area of expertise, so I didn't read it the same way in > > that information was limited to requests of public data. > > > > Nothing really to do with IESG processing of this but I'm > curious... > > Is the full DB information really considered public? I'm glad it wasn't just me ;-) Maybe stating that explicitly would be good. My > impression was rather that trying to extract the full DB > of information via repeated queries would be frowned upon. > > S. > -- Best regards, Kathleen
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Pete Resnick
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Vincent Chen
- [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Vincent Chen
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Vincent Chen
- Re: [paws] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-i… Ray Bellis