Re: [payload] Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-02
"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C947211E82A9 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uuHdiNhEmHmU for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A27011E81FB for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1663; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382463058; x=1383672658; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Ifklvzj1sIQho5eFPEMbJq1hrHWEzl9KSX3Lx3Kppa0=; b=ilIEWgmwUKIuCyhSO8lp83OYNOgm//EM7+xd9cUKx7deb69RpoMT2kYT h7b8HXsh+jNZypnty1Yjiw3NnV+pAxf7a4FjqsMYJTNyZ2B+OCjFLmhab 02QQTNB/KabGCUGqTfGJG8mOCO+4Au2vPB99S9gPsX3s/wfM+P910CX6T 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAKq1ZlKtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgmYhOFS+SoEnFnSCJQEBAQMBOj8FCwIBCCIUEDIlAgQKBAUIh3gGAQy6UI4FgRYCMQeDH4EKA5k4kFiDJIFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,549,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="275025735"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2013 17:30:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9MHUvLC017843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:30:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:30:57 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: John Lindsay <Lindsay@worldcastsystems.com>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-02
Thread-Index: AQHOzdbw2vjQftbAz0q6DC+dHfSdj5n/aArggAHpBwA=
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:30:57 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940E728F22@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940E71F203@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com> <8C4E0C2409735E4FBC22D754A238F94D02FDEAA9@APTSBS.apt.local>
In-Reply-To: <8C4E0C2409735E4FBC22D754A238F94D02FDEAA9@APTSBS.apt.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.252.87]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <80CD5B563845FA42A4BB4EE06575AD1F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<payload@ietf.org>" <payload@ietf.org>, "<draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [payload] Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-02
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:31:05 -0000
John, A few errors still exist (I dont think these are showstoppers but IESG tends to be picky about these when the document is shipped w/o fixing them). > 1) The registration in Section 6.1 uses the old template. > The current template is here: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838#section-5.6 >> Updated please ensure you agree You forgot the following item (insert it based on the template): Fragment identifier considerations: None > 5) Regarding the encoding considerations: This should say "framed". >>>> Don't understand issue? Can you give further explanation? Encoding considerations: This media type is framed in RTP and contains binary data; see Section 4.8 of [RFC6838]. > 6) "Restrictions on usage" field can say "RTP applications only". >> Not sure what is meant by this? >> Changed Intended usage: RTP applications only at the bottom of page 14? > Can you ensure you agree? Intended usage: COMMON Restrictions on usage: This media type depends on RTP framing, and hence is only defined for transfer via RTP [RFC3550]. > > 7) Person & email address to contact for further information: This > should be "John Lindsay email:lindsay@worldcastsystems.com" >> Again cannot see the issue? Is this supposed to be in quotes? >> Changed to quotes but not 100% sure this was the issue? >> Person & email address to contact for further information: "John >> Lindsay email:lindsay@worldcastsystems.com" I am sorry. Please remove the quotes. I thought the email was missing. The submission is now closed but will open in two weeks. Please update the draft at that time. Thanks, -acbegen
- [payload] Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-02 Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ap… John Lindsay
- Re: [payload] Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ap… Ali C. Begen (abegen)