[payload] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 01 February 2017 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: payload@ietf.org
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB229129482; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:13:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.41.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148596923695.19165.12608984760618368616.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:13:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/5G0sZbaxpnzveUmVcYqu4hJ3eq8>
Cc: payload-chairs@ietf.org, roni.even@mail01.huawei.com, draft-ietf-payload-melpe@ietf.org, payload@ietf.org
Subject: [payload] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:13:57 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-melpe/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- Reference to RFC5405 should be updated to RFC8085
(draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis)
- Please also add the following:
OLD:
"[...] applications that use
   RTP over UDP SHOULD implement their own congestion control above the
   UDP layer [RFC5405]."
NEW:
"[..] applications that use
   RTP over UDP SHOULD implement their own congestion control above the
   UDP layer [RFC5405] and MAY as well implement a transport circuit
breaker 
   [draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers]."