Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac-03.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Thu, 17 January 2013 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EB521F8890 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5iCTz93w63Q for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.131.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A8F21F87AB for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.209.247.112] (helo=mangole.dcs.gla.ac.uk) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1Tvnsj-0002b0-SY for payload@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:43:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130116214300.27292.59947.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:43:41 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B24AE5DD-7649-42B3-BD33-1169A169270E@csperkins.org>
References: <20130116214300.27292.59947.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -13
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Subject: Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac-03.txt
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:43:44 -0000

On 16 Jan 2013, at 21:43, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Payloads Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : RTP Payload Format for the iSAC Codec
> 	Author(s)       : Tina le Grand
>                          Paul E. Jones
>                          Pascal Huart
>                          Turaj Zakizadeh Shabestary
>                          Harald Alvestrand
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 15
> 	Date            : 2013-01-16
> 
> Abstract:
>   iSAC is a proprietary wideband speech and audio codec developed by
>   Global IP Solutions (now part of Google), suitable for use in Voice
>   over IP applications.  This document describes the payload format for
>   iSAC generated bit streams within a Real-Time Protocol (RTP) packet.
>   Also included here are the necessary details for the use of iSAC with
>   the Session Description Protocol (SDP).
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac


One quick comment: the examples in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 use RFC 2119 language ("SHOULD"), but I don't think an example is the right place to define normative requirements for implementations. Can the RFC 2119 terms be removed from these sections (and possibly be replaced by references to a section where the response is defined)?

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/