[payload] draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-14 notes

[Giridhar Mandyam <[e-mail]>]

Hello All,
Please note that this latest version is in response to the AD review and covers the review provided in [1]-[4].

There are a couple of substantive changes based on AD review (versus version -13) of which the group should be aware:


  1.  Sec. 4.2.1.  Under the description of the SSRC field, the following requirement was previously a SHOULD:  “"The repair streams’ SSRC’s CNAME MUST be identical to the CNAME of the source RTP stream(s) that this repair stream protects.”
  2.  Sec. 5.1.  All media types are no longer provisionally registered.

In addition, there were a couple of re-wordings that were not directly covered in my latest review response [4]:


  1.  Under Figures 10 and 12 the description of the Repair Payload has been changed:  “The Repair "Payload", which follows the FEC Header, includes repair of everything following the fixed 12-byte RTP header of each source packet, including any CSRC identifier list and header extensions if present.”
  2.  In Sec. 5.2.2, the references to RTSP were further clarified:  “In declarative usage, like SDP in the Real-time Streaming Protocol (RTSP, for RTSP 1.0 see [RFC2326] and for RTSP 2.0 see [RFC7826]) …”

I hope this addresses all concerns.  However, if it does not, please make myself and all co-editors aware of any necessary modifications.  I would much rather submit another I.-D. version than an errata on an RFC.

Thanks,
-Giri Mandyam

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/tT4lQ_oVsDWuRmcFn7OImwy87oo
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/vfiVlSDhj-WY985KJ4Kinmjzxds
[3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/kx_C9UjQpE2ItfCYkE3eJMgKSPk
[4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/t-JKXuPvIeJ9VDbqw7pDwyc9vfA