IETF Logo Mail Archive

[payload] [Errata Verified] RFC6190 (3711)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 28 October 2013 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AB111E80E7; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.154, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luW7bPzSU9Qh; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052E621F9E26; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 10003726004; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: weix@avaya.com, stewe@stewe.org, yekui.wang@huawei.com, ts@thomas-schierl.de, alex@vidyo.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131028215536.10003726004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:55:36 -0700
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, payload@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [payload] [Errata Verified] RFC6190 (3711)
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:04:34 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6190,
"RTP Payload Format for Scalable Video Coding". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6190&eid=3711

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Xiaohui Wei (Joanne) <weix@avaya.com>
Date Reported: 2013-08-26
Verified by: Richard Barnes (IESG)

Section: 1.1.3

Original Text
-------------
   N:    1 bit
         no_inter_layer_pred_flag.  This flag specifies, when present in
         a coded slice NAL unit, whether inter-layer prediction may be
         used for decoding the coded slice (when equal to 1) or not
         (when equal to 0).

Corrected Text
--------------
   N:    1 bit
         no_inter_layer_pred_flag.  This flag specifies, when present in
         a coded slice NAL unit, whether inter-layer prediction may be
         used for decoding the coded slice (when equal to 0) or not
                                                          ^
         (when equal to 1).
                        ^

Notes
-----


--------------------------------------
RFC6190 (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-svc-27)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RTP Payload Format for Scalable Video Coding
Publication Date    : May 2011
Author(s)           : S. Wenger, Y.-K. Wang, T. Schierl, A. Eleftheriadis
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Audio/Video Transport Payloads
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email