Re: [payload] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Stephen's discuss item 2 pointed out that we had a late IPR disclosure 
on this draft after the publication request. I am in discussions with 
the chairs on how to handle this.  I have removed it from the agenda for 
the September 3 telechat. I hope to put it on a future telechat once we 
agree on a way forward.

Thanks!

Ben.

On 1 Sep 2015, at 7:49, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

[...]

>
>
> (2) This is just a process nit probably. The shepherd
> write-up doesn't mention the Nokia IPR declaration.  Were
> the WG also ok with that one? The write-up seems to
> pre-date that latest IPR declaration, which is from a
> company that seems to employ one of the authors. That is
> odd timing really so can someone explain the sequence of
> events and why all is well?

[...]