Re: [payload] Call for adoption of RRP payload format to VP8 document

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 12 April 2011 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E77E07EA for <payload@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyd7RgwUEdHv for <payload@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66689E07AE for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567739E16F for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:35:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-VchmqwarTk for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:35:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.58] (162.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.162]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B56939E15D for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:35:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DA47175.4090709@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:36:21 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: payload@ietf.org
References: <009d01cbeeac$b1776a90$14663fb0$%roni@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <009d01cbeeac$b1776a90$14663fb0$%roni@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080102000907030200010509"
Subject: Re: [payload] Call for adoption of RRP payload format to VP8 document
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:36:24 -0000

On 03/30/11 09:32, Roni Even wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Payload WG has a milestone forAugust 2011 for RTP Payload Format for VP8 Video for Proposed Standard
>
> There is an individual draft titledProposal for the IETF on "RTP Payload Format for VP8 Video"    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-westin-payload-vp8-02    
>
> Based on the feedback in the AVTcore session in Prague this is a WG 
> call  to adopt the above text as baseline text for this milestone. 
> This is an initial text and can be updated based on feedback once it 
> is a WG document.
>
I support the adoption of this draft as the basis for a WG document.
(I assume mail to the list is the conventional method of indicating 
support...)
>
> Please respond by Thursday April 14^th  2011 with your positions.
>
> Roni Even
>
> PAYLOAD WG co-chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload