[payload] Submission of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto-02
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 12:08 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E483E21F85AA for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXZslL6p6Zc6 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4C21F870B for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7fb66d000003bb6-b7-4ffc1b6fa9e3
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 81.AC.15286.F6B1CFF4; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:09:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.264.0; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:09:19 +0200
Message-ID: <4FFC1B6E.3060600@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:09:18 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW6+9B9/g8PTJSwuXTzL5MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujEsP8wre8VS83XGUtYHxIFcXIyeHhICJxKYTLcwQtpjEhXvr 2boYuTiEBE4xSsye/YQVwlnOKNG04Tg7SBWvgLbEwsc/wGwWAVWJ/sZWFhCbTcBC4uaPRjYQ W1QgWGLa9HtQ9YISJ2c+Aarh4BAR0JR49F0IxBQWMJN4uF8EYq+kxL321WCdzAJ6ElOutjBC 2PISzVtng90mBLS1oamDdQIj/ywkQ2chaZmFpGUBI/MqRuHcxMyc9HIjvdSizOTi4vw8veLU TYzAEDu45bfqDsY750QOMUpzsCiJ81pv3eMvJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgVHs TY2rmUO6S/ST2rK+umeLH0VfX7jNS/fAhykxC5y2f3171nIDm0FGw+xPMtGsi79M73jU6b/3 1Ic+2Y7LG/7Lpv/gXDL1krL2fFvV3PNngle6LfbhbZ3Bv6NMaf+9blM+Hd+zi0z02naeDraa d+lX5c2WcPaK8CzGpt3Z7yY6RTGtf1jPoafEUpyRaKjFXFScCABAUHFa/wEAAA==
Subject: [payload] Submission of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto-02
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:08:54 -0000
Hi, I have finally gotten around to update this draft. Sorry, should have kept it alive. This version does contain a number of changes. - The RFC series multiple streams and the new IETF two maturity levels are commented. - More RTP transport robustness tools, mostly FEC have been added. - Added reference to the Options for Security RTP Sessions and updated the security consideration in the template to refer to this to try to resolve the relation with SRTP not mandatory. - Moved motivation why registration of media types are good from Other SDO section to general Media Type section. - A number of small clarifications or corrections of statements already present. - A number of editorial changes. - Added the security concern with variable bit-rate (RFC 6562) - Added a discussion of Application media types payload formats As soon as we have gotten go-ahead from the Security ADs on that the Options for RTP security (AVTCORE), the text in this draft and the update of SRTP not-mandatory (AVTCORE) is what they expect I would recommend that we go forward towards publication whit the RTP payload HOWTO. Before even more changes ;-). Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [payload] Submission of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ho… Magnus Westerlund