[payload] Draft document draft-demjanenko-payload-tsvcis-00

"Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D." <victor.demjanenko@vocal.com> Tue, 28 November 2017 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.demjanenko@vocal.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6692B126557 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:44:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJACU7tMhtWd for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host105.olm1.com (host105.olm1.com [72.236.255.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36E62126CE8 for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ClintonLT (rrcs-72-43-202-98.nys.biz.rr.com [72.43.202.98]) by host105.olm1.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC201B44D77; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:43:58 -0500 (EST)
From: "Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D." <victor.demjanenko@vocal.com>
To: 'Roni Even' <roni.even@huawei.com>, "'Ali C. Begen'" <acbegen@gmail.com>, payload@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:43:48 -0500
Message-ID: <05c001d36878$d4079fb0$7c16df10$@demjanenko>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_05C1_01D3684E.EB3197B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdNoeNOgTQQ8/FbdR2eGp84HJPQB6A==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/pC0FqLQQhk8McdgoozvVF6XTGRM>
Subject: [payload] Draft document draft-demjanenko-payload-tsvcis-00
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:44:01 -0000

Hi Roni, Ali,

 

I was wondering when the next meeting would be for possible discussion of
our draft RTP payload format for the TSVCIS speech codec?  This is not a
well known (yet) speech codec.  It is related to MELPe as it uses MELPe 2400
bps as its base codec.  It supplements the base codec with additional LSP
coefficients and functions as a variable rate audio codec.  Our suggested
payload format is compatible with the MELPe encoding of RFC 8130.  So this
draft serves as a companion document to cover the TSVCIS as a variable rate
audio codec.

 

What would you need from us to advance this work (obviously first to an IETF
draft and then to an RFC)?

 

Victor