[Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6006 (3819)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 05 December 2013 05:03 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22C21ADFA7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:03:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jf_UMdekhsKX for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:03:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814E01AE239 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:03:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9884B726002; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:03:13 -0800 (PST)
To: qzhao@huawei.com, daniel@olddog.co.uk, fabien.verhaeghe@gmail.com, takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, zali@cisco.com, julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, jpv@cisco.com, julien.meuric@orange.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131205050313.9884B726002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:03:13 -0800
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 01:41:01 -0800
Cc: pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6006 (3819)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 05:03:56 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6006, "Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6006&eid=3819 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Udayasree <udayasree.palle@huawei.com> Section: 3.13.2 Original Text ------------- Each message sent to the PCE, except the last one, will have the F-bit set in the RP object to signify that the response has been fragmented into multiple messages. Corrected Text -------------- Each message sent by the PCE, except the last one, will have the F-bit set in the RP object to signify that the response has been fragmented into multiple messages. Notes ----- This section is about response, and response messages are sent *by* the PCE. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6006 (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Publication Date : September 2010 Author(s) : Q. Zhao, Ed., D. King, Ed., F. Verhaeghe, T. Takeda, Z. Ali, J. Meuric Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6006 (3819) RFC Errata System
- [Pce] [Errata Verified] RFC6006 (3819) RFC Errata System