IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04

Mahendra Singh Negi <mahendrasingh@huawei.com> Tue, 18 June 2019 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mahendrasingh@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F946120046; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3L5HgN9dSMU2; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491F1120047; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CB9A06C5FFE05D96C29B; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:49:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:49:27 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:49:23 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.008; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:49:23 +0800
From: Mahendra Singh Negi <mahendrasingh@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04
Thread-Index: AQHVGvJRo/H0xi+it02OhpZtYy+7qKafK1GAgABgZQCAANpqAIABGhoA
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:49:23 +0000
Message-ID: <b38e68d3a61049bbbdd78da2b7e812f6@huawei.com>
References: <CAB75xn6EyVFHDQ-SGMJNGqjvfSBvBpWZ00M=ihfXzLStJ=yUJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn65BCnOLaGK=gRsVziev5aSb6osGdrYtpksnhwVc9B+ig@mail.gmail.com> <01b501d52523$dca74350$95f5c9f0$@olddog.co.uk> <CAB75xn7NJRHVBbAcunwuJ0+TKcPqn-PeCE2BNSY_7R1gLaNYOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7NJRHVBbAcunwuJ0+TKcPqn-PeCE2BNSY_7R1gLaNYOw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.153.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/0dMK6_gMqEEt5rlP_M2lgXrPj44>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:49:33 -0000

Support, this is an important extension in Redundant PCE deployments motivated by real use cases.

Thanks,
Mahendra

-----Original Message-----
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: 18 June 2019 10:18
To: Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:16 PM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Picking up on Dhruv's request, I did a quick review as co-chair. It's 
> after the end of WG last call, but life is full of little 
> disappointments.
>

Thanks Adrian for your comments, they are still within the WG LC period. The WG LC ends tomorrow i.e. 19th June 2019!

Regards,
Dhruv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email