IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98

"Diego R. Lopez" <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> Mon, 27 February 2017 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0D7129E8E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 04:26:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_ZjtQ54pO4H for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 04:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00108.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64917129E85 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 04:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from AM4PR0601MB2161.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.167.123.150) by AM4PR0601MB2164.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.167.123.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.933.12; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:26:35 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0601MB2161.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.123.150]) by AM4PR0601MB2161.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.123.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0933.019; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:26:35 +0000
From: "Diego R. Lopez" <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>, Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98
Thread-Index: AQHSkOxLEqjZbIXvEkKG2nmAeCz6LqF8x54A
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:26:35 +0000
Message-ID: <E87F04A5-88AC-4C47-A7D5-50E1F21C02F6@telefonica.com>
References: <3c2491d4-6178-dbed-4f9a-a076e5f87f3a@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c2491d4-6178-dbed-4f9a-a076e5f87f3a@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [83.42.131.38]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 24b05222-1951-43ae-539b-08d45f0bdee8
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:AM4PR0601MB2164;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM4PR0601MB2164; 7:V+tbKf/D8WDwKEvlvNKM5AL+FMG+d0bMeIcOISnkuVJca7mnxbNmpEN4/cQUBk8KGKJRvluWwq9mV5it6xuHHqD65PkMqRmkj5pJObwLMUyEDB8zbUAqRd/qmeNG+DKFB2XD/mymKqA9aXCliycvmrBx6DinpMp8QC2H3cnB2kCXfL1jtRo0GYVVy20QkYH3cVan4ny+FO636z/KooPq958giV2XpVNWOTcgFPTOxvoY1cNXKw4RusHAr2uh+IDmcon0ozXOakoVYVBp7z4ETnS1AvvLvaKg8pDGj3JRWrPaVy4AqjReKppnFk5CcAcSMF/1il/K6YYMdcTRQMl8ww==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM4PR0601MB2164047BD661E5EE48632A20DF570@AM4PR0601MB2164.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(40392960112811)(18271650672692);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(6072148); SRVR:AM4PR0601MB2164; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM4PR0601MB2164;
x-forefront-prvs: 02318D10FB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(39410400002)(39850400002)(53754006)(252514010)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(101416001)(36756003)(7736002)(38730400002)(7906003)(66066001)(3280700002)(53936002)(92566002)(3660700001)(105586002)(106356001)(106116001)(86362001)(6246003)(97736004)(50986999)(54356999)(76176999)(4326007)(2906002)(68736007)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(8936002)(6506006)(229853002)(5660300001)(6486002)(77096006)(966004)(122556002)(33656002)(189998001)(2900100001)(25786008)(3846002)(6436002)(606005)(6512007)(83716003)(53546006)(2950100002)(236005)(54896002)(6306002)(102836003)(99286003)(6116002)(82746002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM4PR0601MB2164; H:AM4PR0601MB2161.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: telefonica.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E87F04A588AC4C47A7D550E1F21C02F6telefonicacom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Feb 2017 12:26:35.3547 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM4PR0601MB2164
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/1BsMIWgs3K9UjXf4QKBYh1AyZZQ>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:26:43 -0000

Hi,

I’d like to make a request regarding the PCEP over TLS (a.k.a. PCEPS) draft, asking the chairs to make a statement on why this document progress has been blocked for  such a long time and, in any case, to open a discussion about its final fate and the reasons for it.

Be goode,

On 27 Feb 2017, at 12:25 , Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@ORANGE.COM<mailto:julien.meuric@ORANGE.COM>> wrote:

Hi all,

The PCE WG session in Chicago is tentatively scheduled on Monday 3:20pm.
If you need meeting time to progress some work, please send a request to
the chairs and secretary by Monday March 13, including:
- the associated I-D(s),
- the expected presenter,
- the requested duration,
- the motivation to request some face-to-face time as opposed to using
the mailing list to progress your work.

Please note as well that Yang work should be directed to the joint
MPLS/TEAS/CCAMP/PCE session. It is currently scheduled on Friday morning
and Tarek, as the MPLS secretary, is taking care of the corresponding
agenda (see Tarek's thread).

Regards,

Jon, JP & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com
Tel:    +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
----------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email