IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Merging of draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp and draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Thu, 09 June 2016 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88BE12D197; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 01:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fyVPPeyfjOo; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 01:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6768212D12B; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 01:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQM22265; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 08:02:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.41) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 09:02:49 +0100
Received: from BLREML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.20.5.198]) by BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 13:32:37 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Merging of draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp and draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp
Thread-Index: AdHAAUazWJb3STaxFUqXj5i8ILYzigADNeSAAIWXjcA=
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 08:02:37 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C814A95@blreml501-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <BY2PR0201MB1910673575F47C36134C7E83845C0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0201MB1910673575F47C36134C7E83845C0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.244.252]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C814A95blreml501mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.575922AB.00AE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 64c5a8c6d1117e0e2f0ed47f26a587ab
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/1Z7GbZJlrOHKYiTlJ5PBFJMYwiI>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Merging of draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp and draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 08:02:58 -0000

Hi Chairs, WG,

We have posted the merged version -
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

Diff to -08: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09.txt
Diff to draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09.txt&url1=draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp-07.txt

Request to poll the working group for adoption.

Regards,
Dhruv


From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 06 June 2016 21:45
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] FW: Merging of draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp and draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp

The PCE chairs have requested that these two documents be merged before we poll the working group for adoption of the resulting draft.  Our rationale for this request is below.

From: Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 06 June 2016 15:50
To: 'draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org' <draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org<mailto:draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org>>; 'draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp@ietf.org' <draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp@ietf.org<mailto:draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp@ietf.org>>
Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Merging of draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp and draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp

Dear authors

At the most recent meeting of the PCE working group, we determined that there was sufficient support for your documents for us to formally poll for working group adoption.  However, from the chairs' point of view, these documents should be merged beforehand, for the following reasons.


1)      The documents are not overly big or complex, so a merged document would not be unwieldy.

2)      The authors and the timeline of these documents are completely aligned.

3)      Working group support for the two documents is unlikely to be different.

4)      For any stateful PCE implementations that do not support initiation, there would be no ambiguity about which part of the merged document had been implemented.

Please would you merge these two documents?  We can begin a poll for working group adoption on a merged version.

Best regards
Jon, JP and Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email