Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02

Ina Minei <ina@juniper.net> Thu, 18 July 2013 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ina@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B7A21F9E6B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.933, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7lkQ8bhF1eU for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B1F11E8199 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail206-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.251) by CH1EHSOBE016.bigfish.com (10.43.70.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:13 +0000
Received: from mail206-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail206-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8A71C01CB for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.52; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -22
X-BigFish: VPS-22(zz9371I542Idb82hzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL17326ah1de097h1de096h8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h683h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail206-ch1: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.52; envelope-from=ina@juniper.net; helo=P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net ; SAC.jnpr.net ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.232.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BLUPRD0511HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail206-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail206-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1374169511316521_31984; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.232]) by mail206-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E1D40004F for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.224.52) by CH1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.43.70.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:09 +0000
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:45:09 -0700
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:45:08 -0700
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (213.199.154.207) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:45 -0700
Received: from mail65-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.251) by AM1EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.3.204.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:06 +0000
Received: from mail65-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail65-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84561C02AA for <pce@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail65-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail65-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1374169504913706_10271; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.236]) by mail65-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D089660048; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BLUPRD0511HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.232.213) by AM1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (10.3.207.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:03 +0000
Received: from BLUPRD0511MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.142]) by BLUPRD0511HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.135.168]) with mapi id 14.16.0329.000; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:44:59 +0000
From: Ina Minei <ina@juniper.net>
To: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02
Thread-Index: AQHOg5GY+ABIlE/r80yTVh3EuD5FL5lqtFlw
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:44:58 +0000
Message-ID: <70BDAD02381BA54CA31315A2A26A7AD30382754A@BLUPRD0511MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <51E7A874.2080704@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E7A874.2080704@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.54]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%ORANGE.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Subject: Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:45:28 -0000

Olivier, 

Thank you for reading the new version. This draft is restricted to LSP initiation. Mapping traffic to LSPs is a separate problem and is being discussed separately from this, unfortunately no proposal was available in time for this IETF.  You may also be interested in http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-tanaka-pce-stateful-pce-data-ctrl-00.txt

Will be happy to continue the discussion at the IETF, 

Ina 


-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Dugeon
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:34 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02

Dear authors,

I read your draft carefullyand I have a global comment concerning LSP configuration on the Label Edge Router. Indeed, setting up the TE-LSP tunnel is not sufficient. The FEC must also be configured in order to correctly handle the traffic that input in the corresponding TE-LSPtunnel.

I know and understand that take into account the FEC is somewhat out of scope the PCE charter and could be complicated, but, from an operational point of view, it will become very complex if I must used another protocol to configure the FEC. For example, used PCEP to setup the tunnel and then Netconf for the FEC. In this example, I win some time and simplify the solution by using only Netconf to setup the tunnel and the FEC.

So, I would like to know if you think it would be appropriate to add support for the configuration of the FECinyour proposal draft? For example, the EndPoint Object allows simple FEC based on IP source and/or destination. Adding support for DSCP (EXP bits) could be useful as well as address mask for IP address e.g. I put all traffic that match DSCP= EFand subnet = a.b.c.d/z into this tunnel. Then, more complex FEC could be handle by adding informationon port number if necessary.

Regards,

Olivier
-- 

Orange

*Olivier Dugeon*
OLNC/OLN/WTC/IEE
Senior research engineer, QoS and network control
Phone/Fax: +33 296 05 2880/1470
Mobile: +33 6 82 90 37 85
olivier.dugeon@orange.com <mailto:olivier.dugeon@orange.com>

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce