Re: [Pce] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi All,

I suggested to Haomian to describe the H-PCE(/ACTN) usecase as well
where if child PCE does sticky resource [1] handling, the resources
could be shared during path computation requests for various BN-In(i)
to BN-Out(j) pairs (finaly Parent PCE would select only one of them).
This would further highlight the applicability and usage of this
feature.

Thanks!
Dhruv

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7399#section-13
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:34 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Thank you Adrian for sharing your support on this I-D. We agree that no
> one expressed disagreement on that work. It therefore leaves this I-D in
> a draw situation: it missed an opportunity to get adopted, but there is
> no reason to exclude another poll to distinguish between bad poll timing
> and lack of support.
> I suggest the authors to keep on working on the document, including the
> list as much as possible and we will eventually consider a 2nd adoption
> poll.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Julien
>
>
> On 27/11/2018 21:35, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi Haomian,
> >
> > Thanks for continuing to move this work forward.
> >
> > As I said back in October, I think the topic is in scope for the working group. I have read this recent version of the draft and think it is ready for adoption.
> >
> > Although the previous adoption poll did not have a lot of support, no one spoke against, and there does appear to be a group of people willing to work on it - I see 6 names on the document and a further 3 who supported adoption.
> >
> > If the chairs think that the draft can progress in the WG, that would be fine. If not, could they give a hint of what the authors should do?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pce <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept)
> > Sent: 19 November 2018 09:48
> >
> > Dear WG,
> >
> > According to IETF 103 discussion, we update this work with a few changes in the text to better specify the motivation. We believe this work is technically ready for WG adoption, again.
> >
> > Please take a look and your comments are highly welcome, thank you.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Haomian (on behalf of all authors)
> >
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > 发送时间: 2018年11月19日 15:55
> > 收件人: Victor Lopez <[e-mail]>; Zhangxian (Xian) <[e-mail]>; Oscar de Dios <[e-mail]>; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios <[e-mail]>; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept) <[e-mail]>
> > 主题: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:         draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing
> > Revision:     08
> > Title:                Extensions to Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) to Support Resource Sharing-based Path Computation
> > Document date:        2018-11-19
> > Group:                Individual Submission
> > Pages:                14
> > URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt
> > Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/
> > Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08
> > Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing
> > Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    Resource sharing in a network means two or more Label Switched Paths
> >    (LSPs) use common piece(s) of resource along their paths. This can
> >    help save network resource and is useful in scenarios such as LSP
> >    recovery or when two LSPs do not need to be active at the same time.
> >    A Path Computation Element (PCE) is responsible for path computation
> >    with such requirement. The resource-sharing-based path computation
> >    with better efficiency can be achieved together with the association
> >    object in PCEP.
> >
> >    This document extends the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP)
> >    in order to support resource sharing-based path computation, which
> >    is a special case in the association path computation.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce