Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Thu, 21 October 2021 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029473A085D; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMs03O4wJ2wz; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F4D3A16C8; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id i6so674604ila.12; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=B9xp/kwKxekXp8QVgAclHG6DehEm7NezNRMiKB5Gy6E=; b=NnaL0Tg6JfXkierdSgjTqiNuuHMnS6PY84VzFryAhFHVCRrs9/g3Q+Gbr2HSjS0t91 WKMal5Tb1X6pkbBenALV3ZsdKMXRybnZFF5qPC8YHqkTUS0pMZgD0NGQNr3SV3pgWxcY XLqZac1EEXy6GXfdtmox/bM5K12RSB7fNNKllwIT0+6hdixZKN5+YbS/drcP3G6uwm1P hjKZw2LB49vnY32jyuyhBn6K16fXKR+PiEc3hau9IMmLnseCrfIumWHdAJK6dWpQylfm Nqh+pGpQmWqkwsA0wpQ7PUOSE6mJwBD2sjbv02MhdT6A9RRCUQhzX2c+uo77qI06xR1Y TBbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:mime-version; bh=B9xp/kwKxekXp8QVgAclHG6DehEm7NezNRMiKB5Gy6E=; b=IrmkfUA1T4PhFMC0WRDfS35K7Wa/G0QnNwIdH8QBQRSc5Uf1PZxfVwpmyVQBCUz3Zl nJyedqmyRddwn9cspwBcIwpjVNzwOnff0busTffZLT2gy71bmvm9LZBPabBs19dMamHe 4H6WVFb82lJqUzAakTNwWfNOWf6HSWtkC++9eYDCmgXHhEDfXiNpiuw/2JAuy+deaAQP FeljWyu2PFQdYVnNLLimMt/tYDBZCf4jq/Vm4R2CS15lhNZAMqkMHjHUr6YRffiUI2al SGe6nWFUdbJRWhzWIVbFmcnfITh5bs9wH2gpu7SWtni+Ujg9D6o/wZKS2dh0cKD6sgAg AWnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rhw6PXC8+hxrexSsaR7Qwa+mPTrJR4iezmQUi5m6nrX1Nwwn5 fa8CdchvId42QcZBW2+z+CRE4lCSxyP4yw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz944wKL6U2jBZ7AWMJ3fpiwPl+EhGZYYpdOHqE37tPSuiOxtcP0EYqXdbDEKIA2ODLBEDb6Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:18c6:: with SMTP id s6mr3818970ilu.168.1634824865983; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z26sm2613509ioe.9.2021.10.21.07.01.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy@ietf.org" <draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03
Thread-Index: AVE5Nk1OmKfTLQUZwz1GiikMrbXLeY0amt5s
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:00:59 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB2150F6B7192B5FE9EB2733E3FCBF9@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAP7zK5bMaNWA4hkKmnCMPRMZyOS2V6Wpscj8hm19GB+R_fr2xQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5bMaNWA4hkKmnCMPRMZyOS2V6Wpscj8hm19GB+R_fr2xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR1901MB2150F6B7192B5FE9EB2733E3FCBF9DM5PR1901MB2150_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6MiYzCUM6MhpSqk0GxjUWI9gf4Q>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:01:17 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft. It enables the instantiation of P2MP SR Policy and P2MP Replication SIDs on the devices via PCEP.

Regards,
Tarek

From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:33 AM
To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy@ietf.org <draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 8th Nov.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien