IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0271D12D15E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GP-O-Bp2XJoE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452F9128E18 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQN99471; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:03:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.41) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:03:03 +0100
Received: from BLREML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.20.5.198]) by BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:32:53 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry
Thread-Index: AQHRwvaI1MtzKEqocUam6K+WxAnX4J/iDkgAgABj7AA=
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:02:53 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C819FB8@blreml501-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B1C930BE-326C-4DEC-A99C-01E6E0AD6C9C@gmail.com> <e9bba5a5-39b8-0103-edec-468b0ae7cd43@cttc.es>
In-Reply-To: <e9bba5a5-39b8-0103-edec-468b0ae7cd43@cttc.es>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.244.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.575A9059.010E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 5b1261e769f6ebe5a42888b94fb23897
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6gKw_LdUEpaczVaZ6H32TKYh5Sw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:03:09 -0000

Hi Ramon, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ramon Casellas
> Sent: 10 June 2016 14:42
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry
> 
> Hi Dhruv, Jeff, all
> 
> Indeed. Having been involved in PCE-related experimental and research
> activities I would welcome this and could be very helpful. It will not solve
> the issues but at least it defines the ranges.
> 
> I can't provide much feedback, just curious about the rationale to allocate
> a given range e.g. 224-255 > 30 messages, etc.

[Dhruv] You hit the jackpot.... we wanted to get the feedback of the WG about this. 

IMHO we need to strike a right balance that there are enough codepoints set aside for multiple parallel experimentations at a given time, and not to give up a big chunk out for experimentation that it hinders IANA allocation. 

We currently have 9 messages set by IANA, some 4 new messages in queue to be sent to IANA, 13/255 ... so we do not have to worry about running out any time soon :)

BTW I could find one instance in MANET where a similar range is allocated - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5444#section-6.2 

We do need to reach a consensus on what range to set aside. 

Regards,
Dhruv

> 
> Best regards
> Ramon
> 
> On 10/06/2016 11:00, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> > Hi Dhruv,
> >
> > Support, very much needed!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> >
> > On 6/9/16, 5:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" <pce-bounces@ietf.org
> on behalf of dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi WG,
> >>
> >> In PCE IANA registry [http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep] we do not
> have any codepoints for experimental usage. As we work on some new experiments
> with PCEP (sometimes in open source platform), it would be wise to use
> experimental codepoints to avoid any conflict. For this purpose we have
> written a small draft to carve out some codepoints for experimental usage
> for PCEP messages, objects and TLVs.
> >>
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-00
> >>
> >> Please provide your feedback.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dhruv & Daniel
> >>
> >> -----
> >>
> >> Name:           draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email