[Pce] 答复: Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 10:36 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCB61A0264 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:36:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.367
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, FRT_BELOW2=2.154, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FRT_BELOW2=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2EGx_ajoSkW for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFA41A0256 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BEH28434; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:36:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:36:09 +0000
Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:36:42 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.85]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:36:36 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "tang.kexin@zte.com.cn" <tang.kexin@zte.com.cn>, "saalvare@cisco.com" <saalvare@cisco.com>, "msiva@cisco.com" <msiva@cisco.com>, "zali@cisco.com" <zali@cisco.com>, "luis.tomotaki@verizon.com" <luis.tomotaki@verizon.com>, "vlopez@tid.es" <vlopez@tid.es>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01
Thread-Index: AQHPOQyaxQGrvZ5iIUunjZH8kkRvdZrTxBWQ
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:36:35 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84505F15@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <OF9024E5D4.209DC995-ON48257C93.0024D0E4-48257C93.002877C7@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OF9024E5D4.209DC995-ON48257C93.0024D0E4-48257C93.002877C7@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.109.113]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84505F15nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/8TzeKmpRfbxqP_d0o31MsRvWPho
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:36:55 -0000
I can see profile identifier can be used between PCC and PCE to refer to and exchange local policy information. Service function chaining (Sfc) can potentially use this mechanism to do communicate policy and path computation together. The other case can be use case described in 3.1 of draft-avantika-pce-multi-src-dest-01. Regards! -Qin 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 tang.kexin@zte.com.cn 发送时间: 2014年3月6日 15:17 收件人: saalvare@cisco.com; msiva@cisco.com; zali@cisco.com; luis.tomotaki@verizon.com; vlopez@tid.es 抄送: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01 Dear authors of draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01, please find belolw two questions regarding draft draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01: ― What is the main purpose of this draft? I did not see the use case in your draft. ― "A path profile represents a list of path parameters or policies that a PCEP peer may invoke on a remote peer using a profile identifier." Could you please give some examples of these path parameters or policies? Thanks. Best Regards, Kexin