Re: [Pce] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 21 October 2019 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE13120879; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qbwTjBFmEhfo; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97616120852; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x9LJYrec019474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:34:55 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:34:52 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Cyril Margaria <cyril.margaria@gmail.com>
Cc: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191021193452.GE69013@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <155490045947.22938.5359257333272095316@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADOd8-uKZCQnt8mvYu2dwd3jUP1tV44u6ZRfKaF_N9d0utwPVA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADOd8-uKZCQnt8mvYu2dwd3jUP1tV44u6ZRfKaF_N9d0utwPVA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/8cK7ddEJ8fMbbqpT4Hai7yU7_I8>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:35:03 -0000

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:48:00PM +0100, Cyril Margaria wrote:
> Thanks for the review,
> 
> a new version has been posted addressing your comments.
> Please also see inline
> 
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 13:47, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > s9.2, RFC7025: Given the references to the requirements document for this
> > work,
> > I would consider RFC 7025 to be normative.
> >
> > [MC] 7025 is marked as Informational, so I am not sure it should
> listed as normative.

The status (Informational/PS/etc.) of a reference is not relevant to
whether the reference is properly normative or informative.  Please see
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/
for further background -- if a normative reference on an Informational
document is needed, the responsible AD will take care of making that work,
procedurally.

-Ben