IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Regarding draft-ietf-pce-questions-05

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 03 June 2014 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10B81A0230 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 05:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIwgrtGv9RWl for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 05:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2D21A0238 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 05:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s53CONrP030219; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:24:23 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s53COMtY030204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:24:22 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, draft-ietf-pce-questions@tools.ietf.org
References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B7556A909@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com> <055501cf7aa2$b021f5e0$1065e1a0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <055501cf7aa2$b021f5e0$1065e1a0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:24:19 +0100
Message-ID: <03e401cf7f26$befcb130$3cf61390$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIGJU9kqpOuehjUCUcRbzjOBRkShAI69O+9muAhglA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1017-20734.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--13.118-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--13.118-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: cgbqQT5W8he9PkhoQoT8IGiYls8x2M90YQXxsZnRwoIwEhHW5KVAz+FC kwH4BI1vfFxQTUeRyFHR3++jLhd545vxTUCbTIIRLi5PDX0qWHrfSJ1kqMcqwawFMsFDK2DHHr5 T8FhQOXWXFZdE28TAzJs6sZ5vv7JIwcLaPlgzTvmvdf2B19ItZRacPYI/JssKmyiLZetSf8nJ4y 0wP1A6AKutWpVAulZH5MIx11wv+CM7AFczfjr/7EZ2MlSAA2wvxjCUYfnf7uDwMFw0ca/c58ntm davl1h4N+l1+Rs+z2o=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/9L9rV2k8Zykiv4ouAlCo-4wxDAc
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Regarding draft-ietf-pce-questions-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:24:40 -0000

Well, I got tired waiting for an answer so I posted an update anyway.

Dhruv, I want to thank you for your detailed and thoughtful review.

The only change I didn't make was:

> >    Sec 24. Where Does Policy Fit In?
> >
> >         - An Active PCE must have a policy relationship with its LSRs to
> >         determine which LSPs can be modified or triggered, and what LSP
> >         delegation is supported.
> >
> >       Is 'what LSP' intentional? Shouldn't this be 'which LSP'?

Yes. Pedant alert :-)

Cheers,
Adrian (looking forward to seeing the publication request made)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email