[Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5623 (1897)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 30 September 2009 11:42 UTC

Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:42:54 -0700
Message-Id: <200909301142.n8UBgs2a023105@boreas.isi.edu>
To: oki@ice.uec.ac.jp, takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, rcallon@juniper.net, adrian.farrel@huawei.com, jpv@cisco.com, julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5623 (1897)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5623,
"Framework for PCE-Based Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5623&eid=1897

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>

Section: 4.1,

Original Text
-------------
a) Section 4.1, 2nd paragraph (bottom of page 10):

A VNT Manager (VNTM) is defined as a functional element that manages
and controls the VNT. The PCE and VNT Manager are distinct
| functional elements that may or may not be collocated.
^^

b) Section 4.2.4, trailing Note below Table 1 (on page 22):

* Note that, in case of NSM-VNTM cooperation (separate flavor) and
single PCE inter-layer path computation, the PCE function used by
| NMS and VNTM may be collocated, but it will operate on separate
TEDs.
^^

Corrected Text
--------------
a)

A VNT Manager (VNTM) is defined as a functional element that manages
and controls the VNT. The PCE and VNT Manager are distinct
| functional elements that may or may not be co-located.

* Note that, in case of NSM-VNTM cooperation (separate flavor) and
single PCE inter-layer path computation, the PCE function used by
| NMS and VNTM may be co-located, but it will operate on separate
TEDs.

Notes
-----
Rationale:
"collocated" and "co-located" (or "colocated") have very different
semantics! The latter seems to be the appropriate choice: two
logical entites (or subsystems) are located within the same system.
The former means "arranged/placed/sorted *somehow*, in the proper
way", without emphasis on neighborship or common enclosement.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC5623 (draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-frwk-10)
--------------------------------------
Title : Framework for PCE-Based Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
Publication Date : September 2009
Author(s) : E. Oki, T. Takeda, JL. Le Roux, A. Farrel
Category : INFORMATIONAL
Source : Path Computation Element
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

[Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5623 (1897) RFC Errata System