IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com> Tue, 06 October 2020 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <hari@netflix.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B183A105A for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netflix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1sTeGJzdCFw for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A453F3A1056 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id q7so4496273ile.8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 21:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netflix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bSpHM8eOGqLmQ+kP5W3VykVzMctUC/7VHyDhKgQwofU=; b=jtRkmVT0sty50IVrr9/qEW1vvd88XcclZgDU1izRasMEr0TkYyv9acN/lTwseJRP2E IJPmoaqrokLCGmnjJV0vudq7JPmJ6cYdhEdRBqzGznfRgCWR0ev0/otYV4a7eL8OuP8n 1rsqnORwIwcBKj5mZL62SPDYde/TB9Ixw82fk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bSpHM8eOGqLmQ+kP5W3VykVzMctUC/7VHyDhKgQwofU=; b=bNDokRxFHT1cyDWZMpOJgI/eU3Qnm51TtbdeFy6jC2qB2+wAOE4yShtRO3Js6DmYsi W81G63NZ5uZwv+oyAeQBP63z+9RPtx2tX8GNRNMMs82934vuK1g9j8p7Ag8LvdJBEF5f RYQzOQ7MJKWmoXN0rZRJo/QIVh7zsAG8K33CWML59+4V53OvZFwIHh6tA7cYKRMB39jK FyaY9ppz8bYCpbvYUTvc+K1GEjFZ/EX18HmjRwr9aVAlH/j3nUkQZXTZnlsHMkH4mVuc TTdAC9w76Quktfl46gCh3TvMOB8qOUfR670zcyDSDzTzhZEod9hRJGBPInI+FthvKDnj CGdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lL1gMrYtdNn9h/HdyrBxQZG+mQRMzZZsWqdPic9uyreEYXUeI 0tqUHCHSxS6E3WTLNbVkdh4QizMclO1j9VEdN6nOiQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRN+mFfRwy0GXV7CFURFI78mA/SFZivYL8p0cCEKxNPuGjzlHLw9YZEZU0dvaY/G4jBk7JYnP8GQMXNKOhlN0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:c94:: with SMTP id b20mr2076684ile.295.1601957100639; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 21:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 21:04:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL70W4p3Zc4DBsCJMzRLvvU1GqNQavfj81JVpmOKw3Czez9EQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: rgandhi@cisco.com, Colby Barth <cbarth@juniper.net>, bin_wen@cable.comcast.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ee162205b0f8b3c9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CMUB1JbyWAx5O-3Lj3Pfytzta0g>
Subject: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 04:05:04 -0000

Hi Authors,

In preparation for WG LC on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.

We are aware of this disclosure https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2995/

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
timely manner.

Thanks,
- Hari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email