IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Moving draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions onto the standards track

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Thu, 18 August 2016 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B6412DD0D; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9W6AQzkSoRp9; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE8F12DECE; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CUP76082; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:48:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML703-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.177) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:48:12 +0100
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by DFWEML703-CAH.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.177]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:48:07 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Moving draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions onto the standards track
Thread-Index: AdHnQ4q21Z7q0ls3S82oon24KDUtSASK9OKw
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:48:07 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8B1E1B@dfweml501-mbx>
References: <BY2PR0201MB1910BF6D0510D4F6B9CB3A8E840E0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0201MB1910BF6D0510D4F6B9CB3A8E840E0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.211]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8B1E1Bdfweml501mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.57B5E6CD.01BE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: cf1c3511b754f9f28f24abf8276953dd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/E7i2B8KqcEYpWaYmhfeCwhoVTTU>
Cc: "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Moving draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions onto the standards track
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:48:24 -0000

Hi Jonathan,

I think your proposal makes a lot of sense in light of multiple H-PCE implementations. I fully support this idea.

Related to this draft, we have presented in Yokohama and Buenos Aires the use of H-PCE in stateful PCE environment https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce-00

Would you suggest us how to proceed with this draft? I think we have sufficient interest on this work and have a few implementations underway.

Thanks,
Young (on behalf of other co-authors)

From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 8:48 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Moving draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions onto the standards track

Dear PCE WG

At the recent IETF meeting, the authors of the above document requested that the document be moved from Experimental status onto the standards track.  This is in consequence of there now being multiple implementations of the H-PCE protocol extensions, and H-PCE becoming important for new applications like ACTN.  Please see the meeting slides for details.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-pce-15.pdf
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/

Please send an email to the list if you have any comments or objections to doing this, by Friday 12 August.  If you do not reply, we will treat it as "no objection".

Many thanks
Jon, JP and Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email