[Pce] Inter-domain P2MP PCEP Extensions

"Daniel King" <daniel@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 02 April 2013 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF7421F8D45 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6ESB-1xHPE1 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB4621F8D23 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r32JhNWo027276 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:43:23 +0100
Received: from Serenity (88-97-23-122.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.97.23.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r32JhKE0027254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:43:22 +0100
From: Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:43:16 +0100
Message-ID: <037101ce2fda$53af5aa0$fb0e0fe0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0372_01CE2FE2.B57485F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: Ac4v2fZSNET9vjyqTEqdlkXgUncnyw==
Subject: [Pce] Inter-domain P2MP PCEP Extensions
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:43:25 -0000

Hi PCE WG, 

 

As mentioned at IETF86 in Orlando, the authors of the inter-domain P2MP
extensions for PCEP have slimmed down the document significantly and we
would appreciate (especially vendor) feedback on the document as we prepare
for Last Call. The draft can be found at the URL below:

 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-
03

 

The key review questions might be:

 

1. Does the document make sense (scope, requirements and general
readability)?

 

2. Is there adequate detail for implementation?  

 

3. Did we miss any impact on existing PCEP function?

 

4. Suitable manageability considerations?

 

5. Missing any obvious or useful references?

 

Br, Dan.