IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Tue, 11 April 2017 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7418812EAF8; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XOlPGmCfkw-q; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B094412EAD2; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 95A1941029E; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:00:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D1F410287; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:00:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.193.71.173] (10.193.71.173) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:00:01 +0200
To: Cyril Margaria <cmargaria@juniper.net>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <0a4801d2afc4$fcac3240$f60496c0$@olddog.co.uk> <BY2PR0201MB1910E508E23709B7192E688B84010@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <007201d2b23a$b23c28a0$16b479e0$@olddog.co.uk> <DM2PR05MB271BCC4622037210D51F61FB5000@DM2PR05MB271.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
CC: 'Jonathan Hardwick' <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <d360c2c5-aa3c-2cb1-c83b-f00bd952d5fa@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:00:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR05MB271BCC4622037210D51F61FB5000@DM2PR05MB271.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/FBQoEC5qzbYydNYmPwXufCFjrmA>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:00:08 -0000

Hi Cyril, hi Adrian,

Don't worry, even though we missed several datatracker cycles, the I-D isn't forgotten and a shepherd has been appointed: me. ;-)

The chairs had decided to apply WFQ over the I-D processing queue. Considering the low pressure product implementers put on the interoperability along this I-D (feedback to the chairs welcome on that), it got preempted to free bandwidth for the stateful I-Ds and the associated codepoint clash. Now that these are with the IESG, I should be able to share my review soon (i.e., by next IETF).

Regards,

Julien


Apr. 11, 2017 - cmargaria@juniper.net:

Hi, 


From what I can recall, there was no comment pending. Grep'ing through my archives I found : the following last messages regarding the gmpls draft are :


Other comments addressed : https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3oswQvIe4THUtUSUnXwKfmfeVmg" class="x_OWAAutoLink" id="LPlnk237193" rel="nofollow">https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3oswQvIe4THUtUSUnXwKfmfeVmg, also reflected in https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-pce-0.pdf" class="x_OWAAutoLink" id="LPlnk529057" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-pce-0.pdf


WG comments addressed: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vPZsnrCy4kh7H8VaMDz6I-XI8uw" class="x_OWAAutoLink" id="LPlnk172215" rel="nofollow">https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vPZsnrCy4kh7H8VaMDz6I-XI8uw



The document status from the slides is Shepherd assigned.


I will be happy to address any actions that I can complete on my side.


Cyril

From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:40:28 PM
 
Thanks Jon!

Looks like I need to chivvy the authors of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions.

But, oh look! It has expired. A year ago!

Wow! Any archaeologists out there want to dig through the mail archive to find
out what needed to be done?

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com]
> Sent: 10 April 2017 08:37
>
> Hi Adrian
>
> Thanks for checking.  This draft depends normatively on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-
> pcep-extensions, which I believe still has some actions to be completed.  Our
plan
> is to advance both together.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 07 April 2017 18:33
>
> Hi,
>
> Did https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext disappear
> down a crack?
>
> Looks like WG last call completed and the draft was updated.
> Also the shepherd write-up was updated.
>
> Does the big red button need to be pressed to send this to the AD?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email