Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10.txt
"Daniel King" <daniel@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 19 April 2010 22:27 UTC
Return-Path: <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBDD3A6938 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.817
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.782, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-tsA3dXUaLr for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.159]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5B23A68D7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JMRHe3019904 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:27:22 +0100
Received: from Serenity (88-97-23-122.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.97.23.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JMRGE4019898 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:27:17 +0100
From: Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <20100419210001.880A428C101@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100419210001.880A428C101@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:27:17 +0100
Message-ID: <00d301cae00f$7879cd20$696d6760$@co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcrgA0T2i3Qjce08S564b91vGAXjvwAC8yCQ
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:27:45 -0000
Hi All, The authors of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10 recently submitted a new version of our document to address some IETF Last Call and IANA comments. The main changes were the IANA updates below: - Section 3.16 PCEP NO-PATH Indicator The NO-PATH object bit has been updated from "0x24" to "bit 24" http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xml#pcep-tlv-type-indicators - Section 3.3.2 P2MP END-POINTS Object We have now added two new END-POINTS Object-Types for Object-Class 4 (END-POINTS) in our IANA Considerations http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xml#pcep-objects - Section 6.5 PCEP Objects Since the last version of our draft we have noticed another document has been assigned the previous PCEP Object-Class values we requested (25, 26, 27 and 28) so we have updated our draft accordingly. We also updated the text, we underline that we are requesting four new PCE Object-Classes and eight new Object-Types. http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xml#pcep-objects - Section 6.8 SVEC Object Flag Field We documented our request in the IANA considerations section of our document. Specifically we have requested two new bits in the SVEC Object Flag field. http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xml#svec-object-flag-field - Section 3.1 PCE P2MP Capability We have cleaned up our text and requested a new OSPF Capability Flag to be used to indicate P2MP path computation capability. http://www.iana.org/assignments/ospfv2-parameters/ospfv2-parameters.xhtml#os pfv2-parameters-14 Br, Dan & co-authors. -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Sent: 19 April 2010 22:00 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Author(s) : Q. Zhao, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10.txt Pages : 30 Date : 2010-04-19 Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) may be established using signaling techniques, but their paths may first need to be determined. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been identified as an appropriate technology for the determination of the paths of P2MP TE LSPs. This document describes extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of paths for P2MP TE LSPs. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10.t xt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft.
- [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensi… Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-ext… Daniel King