[Pce] RFC 9357 on Label Switched Path (LSP) Object Flag Extension for Stateful PCE
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu, 02 February 2023 03:44 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94ECC1516EA; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:44:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNtP7qDBMzfF; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143BDC151544; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id F2844AB8D8; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:44:37 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230202034437.F2844AB8D8@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 19:44:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/HLnkZQCwNnuAtXKEsiRb4H_9wUM>
Subject: [Pce] RFC 9357 on Label Switched Path (LSP) Object Flag Extension for Stateful PCE
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 03:44:41 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9357
Title: Label Switched Path (LSP) Object
Flag Extension for Stateful PCE
Author: Q. Xiong
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: February 2023
Mailbox: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
Pages: 9
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-09.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9357
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9357
RFC 8231 describes a set of extensions to the Path Computation
Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to enable stateful control of
MPLS-TE and GMPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) via PCEP. One of the
extensions is the LSP object, which includes a Flag field with a
length of 12 bits. However, all bits of the Flag field have already
been assigned.
This document defines a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV for the LSP object
for an extended Flag field.
This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC