[Pce] PCE WG agenda for IETF 104

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 13 March 2019 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A97E130F08 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k8HYa8t7ZJvR for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3A3130EF5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id c4so2292404ioh.9 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4+OI9xVpNUgpX/aAgD+BTxbXTGH3+sSjw+JXoTn5wwA=; b=I6HYvOvJJ6RB7l64fyuarafIrCw08T4YJeVMr3IEkux8dWVy+h+eviRi5yIB7Sn5W6 3bgljSwE1wSIIWUoX8b/64a5WlKXnIwwDVDikVtl2DzGbuQUOUFolu76DkWrS2x4daDj GVhwfENHO5GeC2XzgwmSn6z1P1O/xLOCgi37q805aJcu8ZQ7FADidKgwz5p2mmhj3H86 CL2NONHrRk8rTr83G+cO4LAtSD0dzDCKp6RlPDoFPkLyjVRBYrRPLzAKR92BJL71N2gp OqKvdY9mIs6jMAta6xRdTQKbsQBed7Q8l5oqjHuXyD9JJpzHFd1wSL901rL8P7pEhwA3 Y0hQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4+OI9xVpNUgpX/aAgD+BTxbXTGH3+sSjw+JXoTn5wwA=; b=n/mgGmRc1YZAPn7LatX2e49igYy5IxEApFRnR7MMcvJ1c5/23yvikmlKebFEsSj7PN P2n0KtxQ9pFqMSJfmTd2XOAz387ZWworjghVACfouR8PQRt3BpasPf0HRMqqcoxHl9n0 7LaOtXsfae+2TnwXE/jRRCZTBfCtMN5AABvXgikkypMsqakoNs6/T7IwkagWEXtypVj9 aN+ghPzgQGv9tWV3PyNRWIetsHGwiMc4NMwAMwTIHanl9hnPP19SOV2VfYCFHY/ofT7B oyW8wbXrlHiqUd0dGoeTN0Mt2O7U4l6GfCzHvSTHz5ogg2nQ0uu7vKTEW5BM3iv6Iajs 3hjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVEXAmqqqm2iRhbhJrdgLc0KfDs4N1R7v+w6emZ8mbdhtW5HKa8 o+3muvHo4l5SMEKcpQ1FEKpa93DltLITJZVAKVVQ3yhk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIaQXc/zAV/wgmnQZ7lVDbDIyOo6C/cqP7jX0b9DzqOaTQuz+GvRSPEtX8aGb6qIRXpbn2KE8w57nGNTNQpvc=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ef12:: with SMTP id k18mr16706089ioh.171.1552496050047; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:23:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7bLUNPB0xwaMoo4tJiTvS9-CD8trT9bpOQcU4XwMm61w@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/J-10fIGE-tl2IyJUyCUDaqhk7Rg>
Subject: [Pce] PCE WG agenda for IETF 104
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:54:13 -0000

Hi WG,

The preliminary PCE WG agenda for IETF 104 is published at -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-104-pce/

We were not able to accommodate all the requests in a tight 90 mins
slot this time.

To those on the agenda, do think about how to best utilise the
valuable F2F time during the meeting and what do you want to achieve
with your time. Please keep some time for Q&A and receiving feedback.
We urge all of you to continue to use the mailing list to introduce
the changes made in your draft, list any open issues, socialise new
ideas, ask for feedback etc.

See you in Prague.

Thanks!
PCE Chairs

-- 

PCE Working Group Meeting – 9:00-10:30 Thursday Morning session I

1. Introduction
1.1. Administrivia, Agenda Bashing (chairs, 5 min)
1.2. WG Status (chairs, 10 min) [15/90]

2. WG I-Ds
2.1. Stateful PCE for GMPLS (Young Lee, 5 min) [20/90]
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-10
2.2. Enhanced Errors (Zheng Haomian, 10 min) [30/90]
draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors-05

3. PCE as a Central Controller
3.1. Native IP (Aijun Wang, 5 min) [35/90]
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-03
3.2. PCECC Extensions (Mahendra Negi (remote), 5 min) [40/90]
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-01
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-04
3.3. PCE Controlled ID space (Aijun Wang, 10 min) [50/90]
draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-02

4. Segment Routing
4.1. SR Policy (Mike Koldychev (remote), 10 min) [60/90]
draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-02
4.2. Path Segment & Bi-directional SR (Cheng Li, 10 min) [70/90]
draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-04
draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04

5. Other Topics
5.1. Stateful PCE Inter-domain (Julien Meuric, 10 min) [80/90]
draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-02
5.2. PCEP for BIER-TE (Ran Chen, 10 min) [90/90]
draft-chen-pce-bier-04

* Subject to change, Refer the link for the latest version.