[Pce] Fwd: secdir review of draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15
julien.meuric@orange.com Mon, 04 January 2021 08:42 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6AC3A046D for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 00:42:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.218
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0EPuq1s32DI for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 00:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D401C3A045E for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 00:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4D8TdZ3Znqz4wlM for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:42:10 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1609749730; bh=vfim/mS+4gjhAy38hVLAnxVR0cv3qKTOaElOQSfIfU0=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qwp9UzksZ3n+sVywzd/5jcwGbzZGqWYqv/qFCiujbnqTbp9eZIhGmlCIurWzw3sYy Til92Q67DdgmTyevMzvcCVbe6P0NAAQDnKa7FPFNP+j+cGGbJJ+bir9o3I07w/0+Mg Mn0PDs6XqpNQr8dlgdm9BAWDqKvU2EAJOTOUYiFYX/8os1conXZPIt3AQ7/cPZvW25 OhV0nJ3tyReoH71slpRMzcPe43zKtk34UDVgMVDunfYO6vyWFEw8xcfiC0SmiggXgQ tgUZwrMLcA3ZE0teaeOZo4///qxSZ0YyuY7GwV0xRj8+yCxdsLmjzn/QR/dyj2FWGD 0hkNsvUMiHBDg==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.57]) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4D8TdZ2qsKzFpXN for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:42:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.192.150.210] (10.114.13.245) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:42:06 +0100
References: <1609443669.12212399@apps.rackspace.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <1609443669.12212399@apps.rackspace.com>
Message-ID: <577a37b3-8109-4bc4-d337-6a4d234c61de@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:42:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1609443669.12212399@apps.rackspace.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020301000104000909010200"
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.245]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/JJxmdZ7XRulh8oCfI_Q6ivnHk9I>
Subject: [Pce] Fwd: secdir review of draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 08:42:14 -0000
FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:41:09 -0800 From: Scott G. Kelly <scott@hyperthought.com> To: secdir@ietf.org <secdir@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-association-policy.all@ietf.org I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is ready. From the abstract, this document introduces a simple mechanism to associate policies to a group of Label Switched Paths (LSPs) via an extension to the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP). The security considerations section references security considerations from RFCs 5394, 5440, 8231, 8281, 8408, and 8697. In addition, it recommends securing sessions with TLS in accordance with RFCs 8253 and 7525. Because this protocol extension utilizes TLVs, there is an explicit call for care in decoding and utilizing these TLVs due to the potential for attack via malformed payloads. I'm not a routing expert, but I think the authors have adequately covered security considerations for this extension.
- [Pce] Fwd: secdir review of draft-ietf-pce-associā¦ julien.meuric