[Pce] Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-seglist-id-09.txt (5/10/2026 to 5/31/2026)

Liurubing <liurubing@h3c.com> Tue, 19 May 2026 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <liurubing@h3c.com>
X-Original-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0605F07224E; Mon, 18 May 2026 18:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1779154757; bh=kr53RWFuWMUQitdMgvIpHXLIOZVwGkgh9DOc6Mz2Fqo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=RFtPGgTNFLBqwnTW9iS6RPC7pgdgaLNsPmzZcSyIKAnwWZQkvphR7NdUDJFq36Xxo 0nTwD2xm0LQVQ+pyZz9HAukLdbJXCAz7gJrjB1+QrAW+lwIB2wPaIFJ8peO+yBXeNk 6j3tf8qANL33FQrcvak9m+hIykOk2Z0X7TarUn/s=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.803
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.803 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAmRZEmNKckn; Mon, 18 May 2026 18:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com (smtp.h3c.com [60.191.123.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1EBF0720E9; Mon, 18 May 2026 18:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com ([172.25.15.154]) by h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com with ESMTP id 64J1csu1091140; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:38:54 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from liurubing@h3c.com)
Received: from DAG6EX12-BJD.srv.huawei-3com.com (unknown [10.153.34.14]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD60A20045B4; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:51:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from DAG6EX10-BJD.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.153.34.12) by DAG6EX12-BJD.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.153.34.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.27; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:38:54 +0800
Received: from DAG6EX10-BJD.srv.huawei-3com.com ([fe80::ade6:b219:16f8:9aa8]) by DAG6EX10-BJD.srv.huawei-3com.com ([fe80::ade6:b219:16f8:9aa8%6]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.027; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:38:54 +0800
From: Liurubing <liurubing@h3c.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, Path Computation Element Discussion List <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-seglist-id-09.txt (5/10/2026 to 5/31/2026)
Thread-Index: AdzgsmfagOaVAvKURLK/er3r9lwPOwGfP9uQ
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 01:38:54 +0000
Message-ID: <8411b18727b1498d9a63a730e2ed32f6@h3c.com>
References: <DM8PR08MB741323A62687BDCE44A2951DB33B2@DM8PR08MB7413.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR08MB741323A62687BDCE44A2951DB33B2@DM8PR08MB7413.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.142.209.9]
x-sender-location: DAG2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8411b18727b1498d9a63a730e2ed32f6h3ccom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-DNSRBL:
X-SPAM-SOURCE-CHECK: pass
X-MAIL: h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com 64J1csu1091140
Message-ID-Hash: EOL5JKCZE3WB473TLXII2M22C3E34ZVH
X-Message-ID-Hash: EOL5JKCZE3WB473TLXII2M22C3E34ZVH
X-MailFrom: liurubing@h3c.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-seglist-id-09.txt (5/10/2026 to 5/31/2026)
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/KvMQDshPlvbjhaOFnECcQpXVo8E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

I support the publication.
The document is ready for publication.

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 3:47 AM
To: idr@ietf. org <idr@ietf.org>; spring <spring@ietf.org>; Path Computation Element Discussion List <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-seglist-id-09.txt (5/10/2026 to 5/31/2026)

Greetings:

This is a 3-week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-seglist-id-09.txt (5/10/2026 to 5/31/2026).  The authors of draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-seglist-id-09.txt should respond to this email with IPR statements.

This IDR WG LC is being cross-posted to Spring, PCE, and SRv6ops.  This document’s WG LC needs input from these 3 WGs.

IDR WG members should discuss this draft and include in their discussion an indication of “support” or “no Support”.   IDR members should consider the following:
1) Is this document ready for publication?
2) Does the segment list identifier specified at the candidate path (CP) scope help deployments?
3) Are there any technical flaws in this document?

Appendix A of this draft contains a “cross-WG” information regarding Spring and PCE.   This WG LC includes Spring and PCE to validate the cross-WG information.  In addition, SRV6ops will be informed of the WG LC.

This draft limits the scope of the segment list identifier to a candidate path.  During January – March,  the spring WG discussed whether this should be limited to just the Candidate Path or whether the scope of Segment List ID as unique within the headend node.  The discussion is at:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/JVzsniFIj3sSQ93HT4Sl4fbJDpE/

Spring WG – please review the author's decision to limit the BGP mechanism to a candidate path.  Does this limitation align with Spring’s view on the segment list identifier?

PCE WG -  please check that the reference material related to draft-ietf-pce-multipath are correct and valid.

Thank you, Susan Hares

PS – the SRv6ops is an operational WG – so I will send notification and summarize results.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。
禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发)本邮件中的信息。
如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!