[Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8231 (5492)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 11 February 2019 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FE613118F; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n690ssoyPFNZ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:36:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F5A130EA4; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:36:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C0CB2B804E0; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:36:18 -0800 (PST)
To: upendras@juniper.net, edward.crabbe@oracle.com, inaminei@google.com, jmedved@cisco.com, robert.varga@pantheon.tech
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190211223618.C0CB2B804E0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:36:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/L20p9byiq1rJ9TWjWeuAKWxOy3c>
Subject: [Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8231 (5492)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:36:29 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8231, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5492 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Upendra Singh <upendras@juniper.net> Date Reported: 2018-09-05 Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- Under section 6.1, PCRpt message is defined. In definition of path, Where: <path>::= <intended-path> [<actual-attribute-list><actual-path>] <intended-attribute-list> Corrected Text -------------- Where: <path>::= <intended-path> [<actual-attribute-list><actual-path>] [<intended-attribute-list>] Notes ----- The change aligns the RBNF with the following text in the document (section 6.1) - Note that the intended-attribute-list is optional and thus may be omitted. -------------------------------------- RFC8231 (draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE Publication Date : September 2017 Author(s) : E. Crabbe, I. Minei, J. Medved, R. Varga Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8231 (… RFC Errata System