Re: [Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02.txt

Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com> Tue, 24 June 2014 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <inaminei@google.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27731B2E14 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tFajyR_fU_k for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7E51B2E11 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id va2so560324obc.32 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mofYNyFX54W0rod2CB+F1qTLulmmdl1fhYoI4H9USyg=; b=iN7Y1NFPnOhdqAS/E1LudI9aWNzkRHWxy6p+uUEyZSoUsMTAGMPPzgD2DZYGWjWazT fRvX08Lw1n7xoh/Ksy24YgCJWXd0DdKcc/qZ8lcvST7IK1Untbc5kCzPe6wOzbH6Uh5H E6HvnklMp5437G/5clhtJGcOHocXzwhu8l1vXjtLc++fypf75J2/hoDi2Czx3RAwKJd6 staSECtTquucGxONcloXXryxUfqoatesrtt/V7Iq4GBb0aGydh/5l8m4OJGZ31STNLL8 vxmR0IfvCJGQN6ygv4M9Rylv5gzcN751Qim32HdfaQNzJDxqLTwXG3Osbz8nNxExYffM 2l+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mofYNyFX54W0rod2CB+F1qTLulmmdl1fhYoI4H9USyg=; b=Q+qqv6ZxYt6Fr4aEiZYukhmfFY1pLHCOEE+CFaAY40sFfd1IIU7VkYUowqteU5j64U Zqgll+SwBsRDrxftX23LRcHTQ4xqakLnpSIF7V9AYx8cNDkN8yZ3DwOaBLj1HHaynCp2 Sj+JiXkKHDUYi/NSRbBX5tiii0VGLXXSvVJ7ZsNAuxawtWYiRFkfaO7YUYsVX5AvgZFP Gy2fKh905rJ8LiVO2PazSHQ4HI6f6x3RCdpYeUUf+ZO6y/BVGTwMWM213zUJtkP1jmnf C2RZnoq5saQ7629gqVdlD9S+I5iTswXMFIjS3Wvi8Ch5DJT2IdcGF58g8RjbIYXa3YFb EhWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnks1gSvV/W70kBC8Ag4OemKFRB37ygOGK98+RZ3ZEXlFRkv4Qw0WP1o0vK7AFN8Bn4BM9f
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.45.130 with SMTP id n2mr1937015oem.12.1403624994570; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.149.65 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B3581392E@SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B3581392E@SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:49:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG4Q_auDj_nEvy-MzAao1GF_krFHm=UX5SE9Wc8OVp-bG00YAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com>
To: "Zhangxian (Xian)" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c20c5633585a04fc96e92e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/L75BNVoSlIHzWGmwrb834_H6IC0
Cc: "pce >> pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:51:45 -0000

Dear working group participants,

As you are aware, the stateful PCE work has been making a lot of progress.
The applicability draft is an important document, as it is needed to
progress other documents in the area.

Please review and send your comments to the list ahead of the meeting.

Thank you,

Ina



On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Zhangxian (Xian) <zhang.xian@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Dear PCErs,
>
>   We have now updated the stateful PCE applicability draft (url below).
>
>   Besides the two expected update points mentioned in this thread:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/current/msg03596.html, i.e.,
> addressed comments received among authors and added a new use case (P2MP),
> we have also captured the discussions about referring to a LSP by an
> identifier (details starting from this email:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/current/msg03590.html).
>
>   Please let us know if you have any comments based on this latest version.
>
> Regards,
>
> Xian & Ina (on behalf of all contributing authors)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: 2014年6月9日 17:33
> To: Zhangxian (Xian); Ina Minei; Zhangxian (Xian); Ina Minei
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Xian Zhang and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app
> Revision:       02
> Title:          Applicability of a Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE)
> Document date:  2014-06-10
> Group:          pce
> Pages:          24
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app/
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02
>
> Abstract:
>    A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information about
>    Label Switched Path (LSP) characteristics and resource usage within a
>    network in order to provide traffic engineering calculations for its
>    associated Path Computation Clients (PCCs).  This document describes
>    general considerations for a stateful PCE deployment and examines its
>    applicability and benefits, as well as its challenges and limitations
>    through a number of use cases.  PCE communication Protocol (PCEP)
>    extensions required for stateful PCE usage are covered in separate
>    documents.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>