[Pce] Regarding Stateful P2MP
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 18:44 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457F21ACD80 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:44:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KOH5lOrLw2QN for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7E71A6F82 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id tr6so8070934ieb.4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:44:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m+lCi+A0aZM3FDLZqy0j7KGGI9hxbhri+okVUv3IK/M=; b=w+qpmCnJyHWI7pLDX4UG5QlYaZSkZmFfvXCdtc3wxPXg4tJgUnNyI8uh97YbNFjpco Kxo64LCrNVpa0QbGPSMni5gxrjvc+01HcNX7ZWV12k85DoKGN4rH4/UzQATkv65vO6JP 6GqY1wh4TAUf3bqyQu4C9x9lj3kIpZaU1AVowFfRcROlJU8sOnu1G54ga68DQABTRgPt oI1JGhzUgHMtYvDMTNK7IoeAKE+EdtuMbdztUk8uxoML3SWVhpacdMnAJzVEW+FUKCWp nucx3LZ56h/VqnnPXvWfwr4cgZCyNSzOrMykzvQ8I6eAzHSui8fnEYmo5Dq0/RI3MTl0 PBSw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.164.129 with SMTP id d1mr58219531ioj.37.1415126644539; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:44:04 -0800 (PST)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.80.69 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:44:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:14:04 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZVXlbIoMAKB9aBPHnB-1AM57Tok
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4o=4s+40ymPaaiRa17i168bncFdgBiSdAjp8HJisvsdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/M5wERCQ8LRiO81e9Iahbz7RCd0I
Subject: [Pce] Regarding Stateful P2MP
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:44:07 -0000
Hi, So far in the PCE WG, we have a separate ID for - - Stateful PCE (passive / active) - Stateful PCE with Initiation Capability Base http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-10.txt http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02.txt GMPLS http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-01.txt https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00 So for P2MP, we followed the same approach, and thus - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-05.txt http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-initiated-p2mp-lsp-04.txt Now that work is making consistent progress, Does the WG find this separation useful? I remember in earlier discussion it was pointed out that not all implementation of PCE support PCE-Initiation function so they would prefer a separate documents to claim support fully. If you have any comments on the content of the drafts, do sent them on the list. Hoping to see this work adopted soon :) Dhruv
- [Pce] Regarding Stateful P2MP Dhruv Dhody