IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4674 (5192)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 01 December 2017 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CEE1273B1 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:36:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9w5z_gE8Ya_v for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558E8126B72 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [119.94.172.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C488C18008CB; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 03:36:11 +0100 (CET)
To: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, pce@ietf.org, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20171130121516.0F02BB80ED9@rfc-editor.org> <a59837f3-5bf9-6a3d-0174-481da681c674@orange.com> <591BA6FB-0D1C-48D5-B5D2-6037C8F8FD65@amsl.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <a0be94cc-4bc2-7434-980f-94dcbdd4334e@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:36:07 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <591BA6FB-0D1C-48D5-B5D2-6037C8F8FD65@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/NdNOjmJdmlX0UYTC1YHk9S_oz3w>
Subject: Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4674 (5192)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 02:36:18 -0000

Folks,

First, I support the action to remove this.

Second, what are the procedures to remove an incoming mail to an IETF
mailing list, we been there before and it has not been this easy.

Alvaro,

Can you check on this?

/Loa

On 2017-12-01 08:41, Megan Ferguson wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> FYI - This report has been deleted.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/mf
> 
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 4:51 AM, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like the errata form has become a playground. ADs, please feel
>> free to reject.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> Nov. 30, 2017 - rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org:
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4674,
>>> "Requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery".
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5192
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: Amitkumar <Amitkumar@explo.com>
>>>
>>> Section: 463846379684
>>>
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> Ok
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> Ok
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>>
>>>
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC4674 (draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-05)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : Requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
>>> Publication Date    : October 2006
>>> Author(s)           : J.L. Le Roux, Ed.
>>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>>> Source              : Path Computation Element
>>> Area                : Routing
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email