Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 16 October 2013 16:45 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C4121F9E11 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRe3Paq2G98W for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE06D21F9C40 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9GGivec021290; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:44:57 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9GGis7e021248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:44:55 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meuric@orange.com>, draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints@tools.ietf.org
References: <525BE53F.9060108@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <525BE53F.9060108@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:44:53 +0100
Message-ID: <00eb01ceca8f$0bb21f80$23165e80$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIADTeKE/amDeKmMBZKlqzvjRhTzJmVAlEQ
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:45:08 -0000
Hi, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com] > Sent: 14 October 2013 13:36 > To: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints@tools.ietf.org > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints > > Dear authors of the aforementioned document, > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints? If so, has all this IPR been > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details) > > A response from each of you is expected. > > Regards, > > JP & Julien
- [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor-con… Julien Meuric
- Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor… Adrian Farrel