[Pce] PCEP extention for LSP scheduling

"Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com> Tue, 28 March 2017 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7A312963F; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kwkqAh6AjTk; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620B5128C81; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DDP97266; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:50:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 01:50:42 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.8]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:50:38 +0800
From: "Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling@ietf.org" <draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: PCEP extention for LSP scheduling
Thread-Index: AdKnXVBAphsUqNA7QQqtTrWQrnEMxw==
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:50:38 +0000
Message-ID: <9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785A95279A5@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.145.238]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785A95279A5nkgeml513mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.58D9B363.006E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.8, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: c0b0255de2e2ed9ab9baae2b6f7a6ef4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/OkL1XNqsLOBOI3pxZmsWpWmnxvc>
Subject: [Pce] PCEP extention for LSP scheduling
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:50:48 -0000

Hi all,

As presented this afternoon, the merged version of PCEP extension for LSP schedule is available now at:

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling/

This is a work since IETF 93 with two drafts stating the solution and valuable comments on problem and motivation from f2f meeting/mailing list.

For the problem and architecture discussion, it is discussed and solved in teas draft at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources.
And now the two draft also worked together to provide a solution in this merged version.

Please take a look and feel free to let us know your comments.

Thank you.

Yan (on behalf of co-authors and contributors)