[Pce] Status update on WG Draft <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth>
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 09:27 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1055B12EA7C; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxmyIDr8Byz5; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42C9C129468; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p73so52163356qka.2; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tcUSnIO1vbm2aMIBclMoizI5ZfYcLJxwuGEzDvg1Eco=; b=Zi8yuHjYe5pcVbdVpKiXpTTrrP5sGG6PFE7D7A8OFEGZ90HRzAMrWc8Od5A1g+dvoL WEGieRBNu1ODxQ90j7HKFdg8iFUbSGQ+BSZbFJM3CKZZ/jtDgziLhPEJq0DC8FGZV36q 6MrR4xUhJINDdHv5wb63kPuAegEkd4fQTkLdNd+tVYxLrYRJZkosUaGbZP0a7g4wbQzq j1RoN8uayAXTWvus00qAWIXs19OGAS2rYUZpeXNacwfBMRMo21lb0yMo0UaNqErQCCMY qg8CoiGdrOXkXnarIUdYkihrANHrfyOcuiFSsthPdPy87jh/3k9lDnDBTQiF6jUol/3X cgPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tcUSnIO1vbm2aMIBclMoizI5ZfYcLJxwuGEzDvg1Eco=; b=BP6Bl7+w8+yxgjnjnPGvBMyOpSI5KJjW6cEOCDBQOujJxUpCQmOBP5EfOLlT6F4ssR yjF9iKZt5MTJwUnAvyMbPC+FD5HBSxyW75fe9s6a8zgiT3DEDD6jptm4wfsMfQXhmNEM FpJoylVe3MkGokuzV2mWl/z8VHE0MuTusDzsCGBCCwVd3POXOPAEVtl77Xu8YhmlRvpM 9MYV8HaEhg1aBXS6WlqCoeSxvef+amTeHSp3cZD9v+2R/oqMTGc/WPJao8uIhxo9vJFZ YbPvXbLhWa61HJP2V/r24fMTU0+jvaDG0hbz9SnznLyqvNVBG7Z0Mpfm6XAXIwdB5pVl sAGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111+L07+zmzMc9IpRmZ9uR9PE8yY6wBMTcewOaBndgTBoO3a01c/ UQp4bKo3dzIMPQOsRuhKdPzQIoGNTXWR
X-Received: by 10.55.33.194 with SMTP id f63mr24087628qki.112.1500283661175; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.51.164 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:57:40 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4NgSr-ZC7pT9Zwh4WAxpVQrgCg4prGfHGMq4mo_=mm8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, pce-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11400caeafd11605548002f0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Q9vlYwaprEIhBJsZRokMeUiwbGI>
Subject: [Pce] Status update on WG Draft <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth>
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:27:47 -0000
Hi WG, The following is a status update of the AUTO-BW WG document: Current Status: o Addressed outstanding review comments from Adrian (e.g., added separate down-adjustment-interval and down-adjustment-threshold parameters). o Added missing default values for parameters. o Added minimum-threshold as a suppression parameter for percentage threshold. o Various editorial changes. Open Issues: o None. Next Steps: o Authors believe the document is ready and requesting WG LC. o Welcome your review comments and suggestions. Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-03&url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-05 Thanks, Dhruv / Rakesh